Is literal creation of an NSMutableDictionary less efficient than the class helper method?

泪湿孤枕 提交于 2019-11-28 07:10:20

问题


Is it appreciably more efficient to create an NSMutableDictionary using a constructor

[NSMutableDictionary dictionaryWithObjectsAndKeys:@"object1", @"key1", @2, @"key2", nil];

than taking the mutable copy of a literal

[@{@"key1":@"object1", @"key2":@2} mutableCopy];

回答1:


As Jeremy said; measure, measure, measure.... then optimize if you have a real problem.

Without looking at the source, I can think of possible reasons why either might be faster and that answer may change depending on # of entries.

The real question, though, is why do you have an app architecture where it matters? It is quite rare to have an application that is creating so many mutable dictionaries (or dictionaries so large) that it is a performance issue.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12426786/is-literal-creation-of-an-nsmutabledictionary-less-efficient-than-the-class-help

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!