问题
Consider this case where I have a Book
and Author
model.
serializers.py
class AuthorSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = models.Author
fields = ('id', 'name')
class BookSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
author = AuthorSerializer(read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = models.Book
fields = ('id', 'title', 'author')
viewsets.py
class BookViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
queryset = Book.objects.all()
serializer_class = BookSerializer
This works great if I send a GET
request for a book. I get an output with a nested serializer containing the book details and the nested author details, which is what I want.
However, when I want to create/update a book, I have to send a POST
/PUT
/PATCH
with the nested details of the author instead of just their id. I want to be able to create/update a book object by specifying a author id and not the entire author object.
So, something where my serializer looks like this for a GET
request
class BookSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
author = AuthorSerializer(read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = models.Book
fields = ('id', 'title', 'author')
and my serializer looks like this for a POST
, PUT
, PATCH
request
class BookSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
author = PrimaryKeyRelatedField(queryset=Author.objects.all())
class Meta:
model = models.Book
fields = ('id', 'title', 'author')
I also do not want to create two entirely separate serializers for each type of request. I'd like to just modify the author
field in the BookSerializer
.
Lastly, is there a better way of doing this entire thing?
回答1:
IMHO, multiple serializers are only going to create more and more confusion.
Rather I would prefer below solution:
- Don't change your viewset (leave it default)
- Add .validate() method in your serializer; along with other required .create or .update() etc. Here, real logic will go in validate() method. Where based on request type we will be creating validated_data dict as required by our serializer.
I think this is the cleanest approach.
See my similar problem and solution at DRF: Allow all fields in GET request but restrict POST to just one field
回答2:
There is a feature of DRF where you can dynamically change the fields on the serializer http://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/serializers/#dynamically-modifying-fields
My use case: use slug field on GET so we can see nice rep of a relation, but on POST/PUT switch back to the classic primary key update. Adjust your serializer to something like this:
class FooSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
bar = serializers.SlugRelatedField(slug_field='baz', queryset=models.Bar.objects.all())
class Meta:
model = models.Foo
fields = '__all__'
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(FooSerializer, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
try:
if self.context['request'].method in ['POST', 'PUT']:
self.fields['bar'] = serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(queryset=models.Bar.objects.all())
except KeyError:
pass
The KeyError is sometimes thrown on code initialisation without a request, possibly unit tests.
Enjoy and use responsibly.
回答3:
You are looking for the get_serializer_class
method on the ViewSet
. This allows you to switch on request type for which serializer that you want to use.
from rest_framework import viewsets
class MyModelViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
model = MyModel
queryset = MyModel.objects.all()
def get_serializer_class(self):
if self.action in ('create', 'update', 'partial_update'):
return MySerializerWithPrimaryKeysForCreatingOrUpdating
else:
return MySerializerWithNestedData
回答4:
The way I ended up dealing with this problem was having another serializer for when it's a related field.
class HumanSerializer(PersonSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Human
fields = PersonSerializer.Meta.fields + (
'firstname',
'middlename',
'lastname',
'sex',
'date_of_birth',
'balance'
)
read_only_fields = ('name',)
class HumanRelatedSerializer(HumanSerializer):
def to_internal_value(self, data):
return self.Meta.model.objects.get(id=data['id'])
class PhoneNumberSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
contact = HumanRelatedSerializer()
class Meta:
model = PhoneNumber
fields = (
'id',
'contact',
'phone',
'extension'
)
You could do something like this, but for the RelatedSerializer do:
def to_internal_value(self, data):
return self.Meta.model.objects.get(id=data)
Thus, when serializing, you serialize the related object, and when de-serializing, you only need the id to get the related object.
回答5:
I know it's a little late, but just in case someone else needs it. There are some third party packages for drf that allow dynamic setting of included serializer fields via the request query parameters (listed in the official docs: https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/serializers/#third-party-packages).
IMO the most complete ones are:
- https://github.com/AltSchool/dynamic-rest
- https://github.com/rsinger86/drf-flex-fields
where (1) has more features than (2) (maybe too many, depending on what you want to do).
With (2) you can do things such as (extracted from the repo's readme):
class CountrySerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Country
fields = ['name', 'population']
class PersonSerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
country = serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = Person
fields = ['id', 'name', 'country', 'occupation']
expandable_fields = {
'country': (CountrySerializer, {'source': 'country', 'fields': ['name']})
}
The default response:
{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe",
"country" : 12,
"occupation" : "Programmer"
}
When you do a GET /person/13322?expand=country, the response will change to:
{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe",
"country" : {
"name" : "United States"
},
"occupation" : "Programmer",
}
Notice how population was ommitted from the nested country object. This is because fields was set to ['name'] when passed to the embedded CountrySerializer.
This way you can keep your POST requests including just an id, and "expand" GET responses to include more details.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38316321/change-a-field-in-a-django-rest-framework-modelserializer-based-on-the-request-t