Is MERGE an atomic statement in SQL2008?

偶尔善良 提交于 2019-11-26 21:32:33

问题


I am using a MERGE statement as an UPSERT to either add a new record or update the current one. I have multiple threads driving the database through multiple connections and multiple statements (one connection and statement per thread). I am batching the statements 50 at a time.

I was very surprised to get a duplicate key violation during my tests. I expected that to be impossible because the MERGE will be performed as a single transaction, or is it?

My Java code looks like:

private void addBatch(Columns columns) throws SQLException {
  try {
    // Set parameters.
    for (int i = 0; i < columns.size(); i++) {
      Column c = columns.get(i);
      // Column type is an `enum` with a `set` method appropriate to its type, e.g. setLong, setString etc.
      c.getColumnType().set(statement, i + 1, c.getValue());
    }
    // Add the insert as a batch.
    statement.addBatch();
    // Ready to execute?
    if (++batched >= MaxBatched) {
      statement.executeBatch();
      batched = 0;
    }
  } catch (SQLException e) {
    log.warning("addBatch failed " + sql + " thread " + Thread.currentThread().getName(), e);
    throw e;
  }
}

The query looks like this:

MERGE INTO CustomerSpend AS T 
USING ( SELECT ? AS ID, ? AS NetValue, ? AS VoidValue ) AS V 
ON T.ID = V.ID 
WHEN MATCHED THEN 
    UPDATE SET T.ID = V.ID, T.NetValue = T.NetValue + V.NetValue, T.VoidValue = T.VoidValue + V.VoidValue 
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN 
    INSERT ( ID,NetValue,VoidValue ) VALUES ( V.ID, V.NetValue, V.VoidValue );

The error reads:

java.sql.BatchUpdateException: Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'PK_CustomerSpend'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'dbo.CustomerSpend'. The duplicate key value is (498288              ).
at net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.JtdsStatement.executeBatch(JtdsStatement.java:944)
at x.db.Db$BatchedStatement.addBatch(Db.java:299)
...

The key on the table is a PRIMARY key on the ID field.


回答1:


MERGE is atomic meaning that either all changes are committed or all changes are rolled back.

It does not prevent duplicate keys in case of high concurrency. Adding holdlock hint will take care of that.

MERGE INTO CustomerSpend WITH (HOLDLOCK) AS T 
USING ( SELECT ? AS ID, ? AS NetValue, ? AS VoidValue ) AS V 
ON T.ID = V.ID 
WHEN MATCHED THEN 
    UPDATE SET T.ID = V.ID, T.NetValue = T.NetValue + V.NetValue, T.VoidValue = T.VoidValue + V.VoidValue 
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN 
    INSERT ( ID,NetValue,VoidValue ) VALUES ( V.ID, V.NetValue, V.VoidValue );


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9871644/is-merge-an-atomic-statement-in-sql2008

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!