x-ua-compatible

WPF System.Windows.Controls.WebBrowser not rendering link buttons

由 ＊爱你＆永不变心＊ 提交于 2020-01-15 11:17:43
问题 I have a web page that I display in a WPF WebBrowser control within a desktop application. I just updated the webpage to use styled buttons instead of the default gray buttons by changing from an asp.net Button type to an asp.net LinkButton and applying a CSS style to it: a.btnSave { background: url(Resources/Images/btnSave.png) no-repeat 0 0; display:inline-block; width: 75px; height: 23px; text-indent: -9999px; } a.btnSave:hover {background-position: 0 -23px;} a.btnCancel { background: url

X-UA-Compatible not working in IE 9 for intranet sites

由 随声附和 提交于 2020-01-03 03:01:25
问题 we're making an intranet site with asp.net mvc 5, but have some issues with compatibility setting in IE 9. The site need to be displayed without compatibility view. We did some research, and do these: 1. add meta in layout.cshtml and login.cshtml <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>@System.Web.Configuration.WebConfigurationManager.AppSettings["WebsiteTitle"]</title> <meta http-equiv='X-UA-Compatible' content='IE=Edge'> <meta http-equiv="PRAGMA" content="NO-CACHE"> .... @{Layout = null;}

Which X-UA-Compatible takes precedence? Http-header or Meta-tags?

由 ぃ、小莉子 提交于 2019-12-28 03:54:07
问题 As the question states basically. If you have X-UA-Compatible in both your HTTP headers and a meta tag on your document, and they conflict, which one gets respected by IE? 回答1: TL;DR: The meta tag wins I found the following (updated) flowchart here (link is broken) and associated blog post that provides an explanation of how IE9 determines document mode: 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9128739/which-x-ua-compatible-takes-precedence-http-header-or-meta-tags

HTML5 javascript not working in frameset

由 我们两清 提交于 2019-12-24 10:47:11
问题 I have a page which is hosted in someone elses frameset, however it's all on the same domain ( my content is uploaded to their server via a service). WHY they are using a frameset is an argument for another day, however. They will not change their markup, so I have to find a workaround that can work in my code. I've found a bizarre problem in my test case that might help me if I can solve it. This is only a problem in IE as usual. The wrapper frame looks like this (complete with unquoted

Use 'Edge' or 'IE9' for X-UA-Compatible header?

由 99封情书 提交于 2019-12-24 02:27:10
问题 In my .htaccess file I have this header: Header set X-UA-Compatible "IE=Edge,chrome=1" I optimise my sites for IE7-9 (and other browsers), but now that IE10 is coming up, should I still be using the 'Edge' value or 'IE9' value to guarantee my sites will work in IE10? In other words, could IE10 have such changes that it could break my site which worked fine in IE9? 回答1: "Guarantee" is a strong word. A beta of Windows 8/IE10 has not yet been released so everything is subject to change. Right

EmulateIE7 mode set in IIS7/web.config does not show page in proper mode in IE11

由 Deadly 提交于 2019-12-23 04:43:31
问题 I have a web site and IE8, IE9, and IE10 always worked great using IE=EmulateIE7 mode in HTTP header response from IIS/7, but this mode does not seem to render properly in IE11. The page does not render or behave properly in IE11, although it works fine in EmulateIE7 mode in IE8 through IE10. If I open F12 tools on IE11, I see the document mode is "7." The only way to make IE11 working properly is adding manualy the domain to compatibility view mode, then it works great; but we cannot ask all

Why does http-equiv=“X-UA-Compatible” content=“IE=edge,chrome=1” is not validated in W3C Validator? [duplicate]

由 拈花ヽ惹草 提交于 2019-12-22 03:42:29
问题 This question already has answers here : Bad value X-UA-Compatible for attribute http-equiv on element meta (8 answers) Closed 4 years ago . I have: <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge,chrome=1" /> On validation in http://validator.w3.org/ I get this error: A meta element with an http-equiv attribute whose value is X-UA-Compatible must have a content attribute with the value IE=edge. I am working with .NET/Razor and of course locally using IIS . Is there a way to solve this

IE Compatibility Mode: 'X-UA-Compatible' tag 'Edge'

由 纵然是瞬间 提交于 2019-12-17 08:54:50
问题 I have this in the <head> : <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=Edge" /> It will force the latest rendering mode for IE, but is Compatibility Mode considered the last one? I mean, for example: using this code with IE8, it will force it to use IE8 or IE8 Compatibility Mode? 回答1: That tag will try to force the browser to use the latest rendering mode the browser supports. It will not trigger Compatibility mode. Note that the tag has to be the first tag in the head or it will not work

Force “Internet Explorer 8” browser mode in intranet

由 浪尽此生 提交于 2019-12-17 03:01:30
问题 There are "Internet Explorer 8", "Internet Explorer 8 Compatibility Mode", and IE7 mode in IE8. However, the default setting in IE make all intranet website use "IE8 Compatibility Mode" even I have setted doctype, the meta tag, http header as suggested to force it into IE8 mode. I have <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> and <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=8" > But it still goes into "IE8 Compatibility Mode",

“X-UA-Compatible” content=“IE=9; IE=8; IE=7; IE=EDGE”

由 感情迁移 提交于 2019-12-16 20:16:03
问题 <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=9; IE=8; IE=7; IE=EDGE" /> Actually what is the meaning of this statement ? Some of the examples use , to separate versions of IE, while some use ; ; which is correct? The order IE=9; IE=8; IE=7; IE=EDGE has some importance, I wish to know that. Edit : I am using <!DOCTYPE html> 回答1: If you support IE, for versions of Internet Explorer 8 and above, this: <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=9; IE=8; IE=7" /> Forces the browser to render
订阅 x-ua-compatible