topology

How to call a particular method before killing a storm topology

非 Y 不嫁゛ 提交于 2019-11-29 11:03:40
How to call a particular method before killing a storm topology. I have created a topology in storm, I wanted to call particular method, just before topology gets killed. is there any predefined overridden or any method available to do this in storm framework. Thanks in advance:) There is no such thing... As a workaround, you can deactivate the topology before killing it. This ensures, that Spout.deactivate() is called. If you need to call a method at bolts, use Spout.deactivate() to sent a "notification tuple" (that does not contain data to be processed) through the whole topology. And in

六、Storm的高级原语之Transactional Topology

蓝咒 提交于 2019-11-29 05:59:57
1、什么是Transactional Topology? ○ 是一个每个tuple仅被处理一次的框架 ○ 由Storm0.7引入,于Storm0.9被弃用,被triden取而代之 ○ 底层依靠spout\bolt\topology\stream抽象的一个特性 2、Transactional Topology设计思路 ○ 一次只处理一次tuple 基于Storm处理tuple失败时会重发(replay),如何确保replay的记录不被重复记录,换句话说就是如何保证tuple仅被处理一次,这就依赖于一个称作强顺序性的思想。 强顺序性:每个tuple与一个transaction id相关联,transaction id实际就是一个数字,每一个tuple都有一个按照顺序的transaction id(例如:tuple1的transaction id 为 1,tuple2的transaction id 为 2,...以此类推), 只有当前的tuple处理并存储完毕,下一个tuple(处于等待状态)才能进行存储, tuple被存储时连同transaction id一并存储,此时考虑两种情况: tuple处理失败时:重新发送一个和原来一模一样的transaction id tuple处理成功时:发送的transaction id会和存储的transaction id对比

How to call a particular method before killing a storm topology

江枫思渺然 提交于 2019-11-28 04:21:25
问题 How to call a particular method before killing a storm topology. I have created a topology in storm, I wanted to call particular method, just before topology gets killed. is there any predefined overridden or any method available to do this in storm framework. Thanks in advance:) 回答1: There is no such thing... As a workaround, you can deactivate the topology before killing it. This ensures, that Spout.deactivate() is called. If you need to call a method at bolts, use Spout.deactivate() to

What is the “task” in Storm parallelism

百般思念 提交于 2019-11-28 03:08:35
I'm trying to learn twitter storm by following the great article " Understanding the parallelism of a Storm topology " However I'm a bit confused by the concept of "task". Is a task an running instance of the component(spout or bolt) ? A executor having multiple tasks actually is saying the same component is executed for multiple times by the executor, am I correct ? Moreover in a general parallelism sense, Storm will spawn a dedicated thread(executor) for a spout or bolt, but what is contributed to the parallelism by an executor(thread) having multiple tasks ? I think having multiple tasks in

What is the “task” in Storm parallelism

我的未来我决定 提交于 2019-11-26 23:57:27
问题 I'm trying to learn twitter storm by following the great article "Understanding the parallelism of a Storm topology" However I'm a bit confused by the concept of "task". Is a task an running instance of the component(spout or bolt) ? A executor having multiple tasks actually is saying the same component is executed for multiple times by the executor, am I correct ? Moreover in a general parallelism sense, Storm will spawn a dedicated thread(executor) for a spout or bolt, but what is

商业化服务端的SSP广告引擎

左心房为你撑大大i 提交于 2019-11-26 09:28:48
商业化服务端的SSP广告引擎 当今互联网有几种主流的商业模式:广告、游戏、增值服务等。毫无疑问“广告推送”带给互联网公司的收入绝对是相当可观。今天小主就为大家分享一篇来自360手机卫士团队分享的SSP广告引擎,这么高质量的内部干货不拿出来分享实在对不起大家。 PS:丰富的一线技术、多元化的表现形式,尽在“HULK一线技术杂谈”,点关注哦! 一、概述 当今互联网有几种主流的商业模式:广告、游戏、增值服务等。今天我想谈一谈广告系统中的SSP引擎。SSP(全称:Sell-Side Platform)是一个媒体服务平台,该平台通过人群定向技术,智能的管理媒体广告位库存、优化广告的投放,助网络媒体实现其广告资源优化,提高其广告资源价值,达到帮助媒体提高收益的目的(以上摘自360百科)。大白话就是: 各种端(app端)找SSP要广告, SSP选出一批广告, 并告诉这些端,按照某些样式展示。SSP负责如何去选广告, 以及相应的样式是什么样子。SSP不断优化选择广告和确定样式的策略,让各个产品能赚到更多的钱。 一个好的SSP系统应该具备那些能力? 我总结了五点,列在下面: 灵活扩展能力 快速接入各种广告源 快速接入各个产品 快速验证广告的不同样式 快速调整广告页面布局 快速调整广告策略 2. 高性能、高并发能力 3. 高效发布和在线灰度能力 4. 快速调试定位错误能力 5.

Most general higher-order constraint describing a sequence of integers ordered with respect to a relation

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-11-25 22:36:01
问题 In CLP(FD), we frequently need to state: \"This is a list of integers and finite domain variables in (sometimes: strictly ) ascending/descending order.\" Is there any CLP(FD) system that provides a general (parametrisable) built-in constraint for this task? SWI-Prolog provides a constraint called chain/2 , which is similar to what I am looking for. However, the name is slightly too specific to encompass all relations that the constraint can describe (example: #< is not a partial order but