reply

问题 Hi again StackOverflow's comunity, I will ask about method ".reply()". This is the code I am trying: function Unread ($correo) { if(($correo -eq $null) -or ($correo.Unread.ToString() -like "False")){ $Noleido = $false }else{ $Noleido = $true return $Noleido } } $body = "Bla bla bla" $firma = "I am here" #$cuerpo = "A test ps" $subject = "Re: automated reply" $Outlook = New-Object -comObject Outlook.Application $OutlookFolders = $Outlook.Session.Folders.Item($buzon1).Folders #Map la bandeja de

问题 Hi again StackOverflow's comunity, I will ask about method ".reply()". This is the code I am trying: function Unread ($correo) { if(($correo -eq $null) -or ($correo.Unread.ToString() -like "False")){ $Noleido = $false }else{ $Noleido = $true return $Noleido } } $body = "Bla bla bla" $firma = "I am here" #$cuerpo = "A test ps" $subject = "Re: automated reply" $Outlook = New-Object -comObject Outlook.Application $OutlookFolders = $Outlook.Session.Folders.Item($buzon1).Folders #Map la bandeja de

问题 We have a network of four brokers, 2 "front-end" and 2 "back-end" (I'll refer to them as FB1 FB2 BB1 BB2). They are networked in a square like so: FB1 .... FB2 . . . . . . BB1 .... BB2 The network connections are set to exclude specific queues but otherwise allow forwarding of all other queues and topics. The network connectors have failover defined between front-end and back-end so if, for example, BB1 went down then FB1 should failover and establish a new network connection to BB2. Clients

问题 I'm trying to make a reply box appear below its own comment, instead of at the end of all the comments. For anyone trying to create their own Wordpress comment list, it would be very helpful. As of now, I have tried: <div id="div-comment-<?php comment_ID(); ?>" class="reply"> <?php comment_reply_link(array_merge( $args, array('depth' => $depth, 'add_below' => 'comment-footer', 'max_depth' => $args['max_depth']))) ?> <?php delete_comment_link(get_comment_ID()); ?> </div> <div id="comment

问题 This twitter script can currently tweet the selected user once they tweet, but instead of actually replying underneath the tweet, it tweets it as a standalone new tweet. How can I get it to actually reply instead of make a new tweet? I'm using Twit API: https://github.com/ttezel/twit Here's what I have: console.log('The bot is starting'); var Twit = require('twit'); var config = require('./config'); var T = new Twit(config); //Setting up a user stream var stream = T.stream('user'); stream.on(

问题 I need to find the size of a file or a directory whatever given in the commandline using stat(). It works fine for the files (both relative and absolute paths) but when I give a directory, it always returns the size as 512 or 1024. If I print the files in the directory it goes as follows : Name : . Name : .. Name : new Name : new.c but only the new and new.c files are actually in there. For this, the size is returned as 512 even if I place more files in the directory. Here s my code fragment:

问题 I'm currently developing a cache that needs increase a few hundred counters for every call like this: redis.pipelined do keys.each{ |key| redis.incr key } end In my profiling now I saw that the replies I don't need are still collected by the redis gem and waste some valueable time. Can I tell redis in some way that I'm not interested in the replies? Is there a better way to increment lots of values. I didn't find a MINCR command, for example.. Thanks in advance! 回答1: Yes... in 2.6, at least.

问题 How do I know the fields I can access from the reply object/interface? I tried reflection but it seems you have to know the field name first. What if I need to know all the fields available to me? // Do sends a command to the server and returns the received reply. Do(commandName string, args ...interface{}) (reply interface{}, err error) 回答1: You can use the reflect.TypeOf() function to obtain a reflect.Type type descriptor. From there, you can list fields of the dynamic value stored in the

问题 Section 3.6.2 of RFC 5322 defines the reply-to header as: reply-to = "Reply-To:" address-list CRLF Where address-list is defined at section 3.4. When unfolding the ABNF grammar, I find that address-list can consist of nothing but phrase ":" ";" ( phrase being defined at section 3.2.5). So it boils down to you being able to add a reply-to header that does not contains any actual e-mail address. The RFC states: When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the address(es) to which the

问题 I've a Mule(3.5) flow with JMS request-reply block. I saw that all the messages coming to reply queue get consumed automatically. I would like to process messages that come to jms reply queue. I've tried with jms:selector and jms requester module so far but no luck. Is there any way to achieve this? Code: <mule> <flow name="main" doc:name="main"> <http:inbound-endpoint exchange-pattern="request-response" host="localhost" path="test" port="2000" doc:name="HTTP"/> <logger message="starting main