Why use Optional.of over Optional.ofNullable?
问题 When using the Java 8 Optional class, there are two ways in which a value can be wrapped in an optional. String foobar = <value or null>; Optional.of(foobar); // May throw NullPointerException Optional.ofNullable(foobar); // Safe from NullPointerException I understand Optional.ofNullable is the only safe way of using Optional , but why does Optional.of exist at all? Why not just use Optional.ofNullable and be on the safe side at all times? 回答1: Your question is based on assumption that the