normalization

Phone number normalization: Any pre-existing libraries?

狂风中的少年 提交于 2019-12-31 18:54:11
问题 I have a system which is using phone numbers as unique identifiers. For this reason, I want to format all phone numbers as they come in using a normalized format. Because I have no control over my source data, I need to parse out these numbers myself and format them before adding them to my DB. I'm about to write a parser that can read phone numbers in and output a normalized phone format, but before I do I was wondering if anyone knew of any pre-existing libraries I could use to format phone

Phone number normalization: Any pre-existing libraries?

家住魔仙堡 提交于 2019-12-31 18:54:06
问题 I have a system which is using phone numbers as unique identifiers. For this reason, I want to format all phone numbers as they come in using a normalized format. Because I have no control over my source data, I need to parse out these numbers myself and format them before adding them to my DB. I'm about to write a parser that can read phone numbers in and output a normalized phone format, but before I do I was wondering if anyone knew of any pre-existing libraries I could use to format phone

SQL Joins vs Single Table : Performance Difference?

时光毁灭记忆、已成空白 提交于 2019-12-31 17:53:26
问题 I am trying to stick to the practice of keeping the database normalized, but that leads to the need to run multiple join queries. Is there a performance degradation if many queries use joins vs having a call to a single table that might contain redundant data? 回答1: Keep the Database normalised UNTIL you have discovered a bottleneck. Then only after careful profiling should you denormalise. In most instances, having a good covering set of indexes and up to date statistics will solve most

How to interpret MSE in Keras Regressor

◇◆丶佛笑我妖孽 提交于 2019-12-31 03:00:58
问题 I am new to Keras/TF/Deep Learning and I am trying to build a model to predict house prices. I have some features X (no. of bathrooms , etc.) and target Y (ranging around $300,000 to $800,000) I have used sklearn's Standard Scaler to standardize Y before fitting it to the model. Here is my Keras model: def build_model(): model = Sequential() model.add(Dense(36, input_dim=36, activation='relu')) model.add(Dense(18, input_dim=36, activation='relu')) model.add(Dense(1, activation='sigmoid'))

more performant to have normalized or denormalized tables

一笑奈何 提交于 2019-12-31 01:33:33
问题 I am currently developing an mvc application to read from an existing sql server database. The database is denormalized - and I was looking at modifying some tables to normalize it to a degree. This led to a discussion with a fellow developer as the most preformant way to read the data, or if the structure should change or not. The data will be read via ado.net with a stored procedure. Question I have is, is it more performant to have numerous fields in a table (denormalized) OR have several

Normalizing feature values for SVM

萝らか妹 提交于 2019-12-30 18:26:13
问题 I've been playing with some SVM implementations and I am wondering - what is the best way to normalize feature values to fit into one range? (from 0 to 1) Let's suppose I have 3 features with values in ranges of: 3 - 5. 0.02 - 0.05 10-15. How do I convert all of those values into range of [0,1]? What If, during training, the highest value of feature number 1 that I will encounter is 5 and after I begin to use my model on much bigger datasets, I will stumble upon values as high as 7? Then in

Normalizing feature values for SVM

随声附和 提交于 2019-12-30 18:26:09
问题 I've been playing with some SVM implementations and I am wondering - what is the best way to normalize feature values to fit into one range? (from 0 to 1) Let's suppose I have 3 features with values in ranges of: 3 - 5. 0.02 - 0.05 10-15. How do I convert all of those values into range of [0,1]? What If, during training, the highest value of feature number 1 that I will encounter is 5 and after I begin to use my model on much bigger datasets, I will stumble upon values as high as 7? Then in

How to keep foreign key relations consistent in a “diamond-shaped” system of relationships

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-12-29 07:04:27
问题 Consider this situation: a Car is bought from a Salesperson . A Salesperson works at a Showroom (and at only one Showroom). A Showroom is affiliated to a Manufacturer , and only sells cars made by that Manufacturer. At the same time, a Car is of a particular Model , and a Model is made by a Manufacturer. Restriction R: A Car's Model's Manufacturer must be the same Manufacturer as the Car's Salesperson's Showroom's affiliated Manufacturer. The diagram shows the obvious foreign key

How to keep foreign key relations consistent in a “diamond-shaped” system of relationships

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-29 07:04:20
问题 Consider this situation: a Car is bought from a Salesperson . A Salesperson works at a Showroom (and at only one Showroom). A Showroom is affiliated to a Manufacturer , and only sells cars made by that Manufacturer. At the same time, a Car is of a particular Model , and a Model is made by a Manufacturer. Restriction R: A Car's Model's Manufacturer must be the same Manufacturer as the Car's Salesperson's Showroom's affiliated Manufacturer. The diagram shows the obvious foreign key

PCA first or normalization first?

只谈情不闲聊 提交于 2019-12-29 03:36:08
问题 When doing regression or classification, what is the correct (or better) way to preprocess the data? Normalize the data -> PCA -> training PCA -> normalize PCA output -> training Normalize the data -> PCA -> normalize PCA output -> training Which of the above is more correct, or is the "standardized" way to preprocess the data? By "normalize" I mean either standardization, linear scaling or some other techniques. 回答1: You should normalize the data before doing PCA. For example, consider the