nginx

问题 I get an error when I access my index.php of my /usr/local/nginx-1.12.2/html . An error occurred. Sorry, the page you are looking for is currently unavailable. Please try again later. If you are the system administrator of this resource then you should check the error log for details. Faithfully yours, nginx. My nginx.conf is this: # cat conf/nginx.conf : worker_processes 1; events { worker_connections 1024; } http { include mime.types; default_type application/octet-stream; sendfile on;

问题 I'm trying to deploy Angular app with Nginx Here is my nginx conf: server { listen 443 ssl http2; listen [::]:443 ssl http2; server_name mysite.com; root /home/forge/mysite.com/dist/; ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/ssl/mysite.com/370952/server.crt; ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/ssl/mysite.com/370952/server.key; ssl_protocols TLSv1.2; ssl_ciphers ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA512:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA512:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384; ssl_prefer_server

问题 I'm trying to deploy Angular app with Nginx Here is my nginx conf: server { listen 443 ssl http2; listen [::]:443 ssl http2; server_name mysite.com; root /home/forge/mysite.com/dist/; ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/ssl/mysite.com/370952/server.crt; ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/ssl/mysite.com/370952/server.key; ssl_protocols TLSv1.2; ssl_ciphers ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA512:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA512:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384; ssl_prefer_server

问题 I'm trying to deploy Angular app with Nginx Here is my nginx conf: server { listen 443 ssl http2; listen [::]:443 ssl http2; server_name mysite.com; root /home/forge/mysite.com/dist/; ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/ssl/mysite.com/370952/server.crt; ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/ssl/mysite.com/370952/server.key; ssl_protocols TLSv1.2; ssl_ciphers ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA512:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA512:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384; ssl_prefer_server

问题 I am currently running a Gunicorn server in a Docker container serving both a Flask application and static content (on Swisscom CloudFoundry). What is the correct way to set up nginx as a reverse proxy for serving the static content? I assume the Staticfile buildpack is not the way to go? Could someone point me in the right direction? 回答1: If you're using Cloud Foundry, it's super easy to spin up an extra instance or two to scale your app up and handle more load. I would recommend doing this

问题 I am currently running a Gunicorn server in a Docker container serving both a Flask application and static content (on Swisscom CloudFoundry). What is the correct way to set up nginx as a reverse proxy for serving the static content? I assume the Staticfile buildpack is not the way to go? Could someone point me in the right direction? 回答1: If you're using Cloud Foundry, it's super easy to spin up an extra instance or two to scale your app up and handle more load. I would recommend doing this

问题 I am currently running a Gunicorn server in a Docker container serving both a Flask application and static content (on Swisscom CloudFoundry). What is the correct way to set up nginx as a reverse proxy for serving the static content? I assume the Staticfile buildpack is not the way to go? Could someone point me in the right direction? 回答1: If you're using Cloud Foundry, it's super easy to spin up an extra instance or two to scale your app up and handle more load. I would recommend doing this

问题 I have a WSGI application using CherryPy hosted using uWSGI behind a ngnix server. I would like for the application itself to be "portable". That is, the application should not know or care what URL it is mapped to, and should even work if mapped to multiple different URLs. I want to DRY by keeping the URL mapping information in one place only. Unfortunately, the only way I have found to do this involves using uwsgi_modifier 30 , which has been called an ugly hack. Can I avoid that hack? For

问题 I have a WSGI application using CherryPy hosted using uWSGI behind a ngnix server. I would like for the application itself to be "portable". That is, the application should not know or care what URL it is mapped to, and should even work if mapped to multiple different URLs. I want to DRY by keeping the URL mapping information in one place only. Unfortunately, the only way I have found to do this involves using uwsgi_modifier 30 , which has been called an ugly hack. Can I avoid that hack? For

问题 I have a WSGI application using CherryPy hosted using uWSGI behind a ngnix server. I would like for the application itself to be "portable". That is, the application should not know or care what URL it is mapped to, and should even work if mapped to multiple different URLs. I want to DRY by keeping the URL mapping information in one place only. Unfortunately, the only way I have found to do this involves using uwsgi_modifier 30 , which has been called an ugly hack. Can I avoid that hack? For