microfocus

Is there actually COBOL in .NET?

可紊 提交于 2021-01-20 15:53:26
问题 I was checking Microsoft's Visual Studio page just now and in the advertisements sidebar I suddenly saw an incredible advertisement: "Net Express is a COBOL development environment for extending core business processes to the .NET Framework and other distributed platforms." Of course I followed the link and found a company that does this, but are there places still using COBOL? Does anyone actually use COBOL in .NET frameworks? 回答1: Micro Focus make a COBOL development suite that is

Is there actually COBOL in .NET?

馋奶兔 提交于 2021-01-20 15:50:51
问题 I was checking Microsoft's Visual Studio page just now and in the advertisements sidebar I suddenly saw an incredible advertisement: "Net Express is a COBOL development environment for extending core business processes to the .NET Framework and other distributed platforms." Of course I followed the link and found a company that does this, but are there places still using COBOL? Does anyone actually use COBOL in .NET frameworks? 回答1: Micro Focus make a COBOL development suite that is

Decimals in COBOL

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2020-06-15 06:25:10
问题 I'm very new to COBOL. I'm following the tutorials that came with Micro Focus and I can't seem to get the example to work right. I'm trying to print -123.45 and I keep getting the following, I looked up a number of posts on here and they don't address my problem. I'm using Micro Focus' Visual COBOL in Eclipse. Here's my code, program-id. tictac as "tictac". environment division. configuration section. data division. working-storage section. 01 WS-NUM3 PIC S9(3)V9(2) VALUE -123.45. procedure

Different results using OCCURS with different compilers

守給你的承諾、 提交于 2019-12-14 02:38:51
问题 I'm attempting to output the following row using DISPLAY and am getting the correct result in Micro Focus COBOL in Visual Studio and the Tutorialspoint COBOL compiler, but something strange when running it on a z/OS Mainframe using IBM's Enterprise COBOL: 01 W05-OUTPUT-ROW. 05 W05-OFFICE-NAME PIC X(13). 05 W05-BENEFIT-ROW OCCURS 5 TIMES. 10 PIC X(2) VALUE SPACES. 10 W05-B-TOTAL PIC ZZ,ZZ9.99 VALUE ZEROS. 05 PIC X(2) VALUE SPACES. 05 W05-OFFICE-TOTAL PIC ZZ,ZZ9.99 VALUE ZEROS. It appears in

Vertica performance degradation while loading parquet files over delimited files from s3 to vertica

瘦欲@ 提交于 2019-12-11 14:10:16
问题 I have parquet files for 2 Billion records with GZIP compression and the same data with SNAPPY compression. Also, I have Delimited files for the same 2 Billion records. We have 72 Vertica nodes in AWS prod, we are seeing a huge performance spike for parquet files while moving data from s3 to Vertica with COPY command than Delimited files. Parquet takes 7x more time than Delimited files eventhough delimited file size is 50X more than parquet. Below are the stats for the test we conducted.

What can cause CICS transaction to write out of CICS allocated memory?

梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-12-08 13:34:41
问题 I'm using CICS in Cobol program and I've noticed that sometimes data are written out of the CICS memory. It cause a data corruption and my application stop. I don't know where it append, so I'm creating a parser to analyse my Cobol code to look for possible corruption in COMMAREA used by CICS. Now I checked following statements : EXEC CICS XCTL EXEC CICS LINK EXEC CICS RETURN TRANSID For each, I check if sent length (declared in LENGTH parameter) is not greater than sent COMMAREA . Then I