lgpl

2D Geometry library: LGPL alternative to CGAL? [closed]

折月煮酒 提交于 2019-12-02 16:37:10
CGAL seems to do just about everything I need and a little more for my upcoming project. It can create polygons out of arc line segments and run boolean operations on them. It has spatial sorting packages already that would save me a lot of time regarding a few things and the whole library seems quite standardized and well planned. There's just the issue with the license being QPL (GPL for the upcoming version 4.0) for most of the packages (except the very basic ones). I've got a meager budget and can likely not gather funds to buy the commercial licenses for those specific packages in CGAL

About MySQL++, GPL and LGPL [closed]

纵然是瞬间 提交于 2019-12-01 05:34:15
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 4 years ago . MySQL++ is licensed though LGPL, that means that I could release an executable dynamically linked against it without worrying about the source code not being GPL. But, MySQL++ DOES link against libmysqlclient{_r}.{a,so} ( http://tangentsoft.net/mysql++/#linkerrors ) which is GPLed. As seen as then MySQL++ is

GNU Lesser GPL, application sell? [duplicate]

a 夏天 提交于 2019-11-30 03:43:26
Possible Duplicate: Using LGPL library in a commercial Java application Hello guys! There is a project under the GNU Lesser GPL license. I want to use this project in my application. Can I sell my application using this license? In a nutshell, the idea of LGPL'd projects (usually libraries) is that you are free to use them as you wish in your own application, be it open or closed source, free or proprietary - as long as you publish the source code of the LGPL'd part (if you modify the LGPL'd part, you must publish the modified sources, under LGPL). Additionally, the libraries must be linked

Using LGPL library in Paid Android App [closed]

女生的网名这么多〃 提交于 2019-11-29 21:02:12
Can I use a LGPL library in my paid android application? I am not going to modify the LGPL lib, I just want to use it. Is it legal? If you're making a paid Android app you'll probably have problems with a specific issue of LGPL: substitutability. Generally, it states that when you distribute a combined work you have to provide a user with possibility to substitute the library with a different version (e.g. newer). Very doubtful in the case of DEX file, as mentioned in previous comments. An alternative to a single DEX file is to make from a dependent library a separate application, released on

GNU Lesser GPL, application sell? [duplicate]

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-11-29 01:19:21
问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 9 years ago . Possible Duplicate: Using LGPL library in a commercial Java application Hello guys! There is a project under the GNU Lesser GPL license. I want to use this project in my application. Can I sell my application using this license? 回答1: In a nutshell, the idea of LGPL'd projects (usually libraries) is that you are free to use them as you wish in your own application, be it open or closed source, free or proprietary - as long as you

Using LGPL library in Paid Android App [closed]

我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2019-11-28 18:01:33
问题 Can I use a LGPL library in my paid android application? I am not going to modify the LGPL lib, I just want to use it. Is it legal? 回答1: If you're making a paid Android app you'll probably have problems with a specific issue of LGPL: substitutability. Generally, it states that when you distribute a combined work you have to provide a user with possibility to substitute the library with a different version (e.g. newer). Very doubtful in the case of DEX file, as mentioned in previous comments.

Qt single EXE with LGPL? [closed]

旧巷老猫 提交于 2019-11-27 18:37:52
I don't know much about the LGPL/GPL when it comes to distributing programs (without a Qt license); If I made a program, could I statically link the libraries to the exe so I have a single file to distribute when: The program does not cost anything, it's just being distributed (closed source or open source)? When you have to pay for the program can you still statically link? No, if your program is closed source and you want to link against the LGPL version of Qt you must use dynamic linking. If you want to statically link then you must buy a license for Qt. To use LGPL code in your closed

Qt single EXE with LGPL? [closed]

青春壹個敷衍的年華 提交于 2019-11-26 19:32:11
问题 I don't know much about the LGPL/GPL when it comes to distributing programs (without a Qt license); If I made a program, could I statically link the libraries to the exe so I have a single file to distribute when: The program does not cost anything, it's just being distributed (closed source or open source)? When you have to pay for the program can you still statically link? 回答1: No, if your program is closed source and you want to link against the LGPL version of Qt you must use dynamic

GPL/LGPL and Static Linking [closed]

為{幸葍}努か 提交于 2019-11-26 12:51:00
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 4 years ago . I have read on the web that following combination exists : Proprietary Source code + GPL Source code - > GPL Source code ( All code has to be released under GPL) Proprietary Source code + LGPL Source code - > Proprietary Source code ( All code remains Proprietary ) Now how does statically/Dynamically linking GPL