lgpl

Circumventing GPL Packaging of Non-Virally-Licensed Libraries for Debian or Ubuntu [closed]

由 只谈情不闲聊 提交于 2019-12-11 02:06:14
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 4 years ago . I want to use certain libraries in my application which have licenses that are compatible with closed-source distribution, such as LGPL and BSD. However, on the Linux distribution I use, Ubuntu, the "packaging" of these libraries is marked by the copyright file as being GPL-protected. I want to avoid GPL

iOS app and LGPL issue [closed]

由 我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2019-12-10 14:18:44
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 4 years ago . I have an iOS app which use the ffmpeg library, and iOS should compile in static link. According to the LGPLv2, do I release my source code related my UI or other bussiness logic ? 回答1: The interaction between the LGPL and Apple's app store is a disputed issue. The only way to get advice you can rely on is to

Does Apple allow Qt on iOS as dynamic library? [closed]

由 China☆狼群 提交于 2019-12-08 15:40:38
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 6 years ago . With the technology preview of Android/iOS support in Qt 5.1, are there any news on deploying to Apple's app store yet? Since the non-commercial version of Qt is LGPL-licensed, and dylibs are usually not permitted by the app store rules, there would not to be an exception either on Digia's or Apple's side,

What files do I need to distribute if requested to comply with LGPL in an iPhone app? [closed]

由 ⅰ亾dé卋堺 提交于 2019-12-05 16:14:37
Closed. This question is off-topic . It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 4 years ago . I'm working on an iPhone app which uses the Zbar library which is under the LGPL licence. What I'd like to know is what I need to give someone if they request a copy of the code under this licence for my iPhone app? I've been told they are in the build folder and also that they are .o files. I've found some of those in the armv6 and armv7 folders along with a LinkFileList and what looks like a terminal app with

Using LGPL library in a commercial Java application [closed]

由 二次信任 提交于 2019-12-04 18:07:17
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 4 years ago . I have a commercial Java application which I will be distributing . I want to use an LGPL'd java library. I wont be modifying the library. Does the LGPL license of that library have any impact on my application's license? 回答1: Yes, it does to a certain degree. You are e.g required to allow people to upgrade the

LGPL/GPL licensing [closed]

由 人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-12-03 12:57:35
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 6 years ago . I have a commercial web app that uses a component under LGPL. Since this component has a plug in architecture, I have now created a plug for this component that use a library (LGPL). This library uses a data source which is GPL. Does this mean I have to free the source for my web app? or is it just necessary to

Using LGPL library in a commercial Java application [closed]

由 落花浮王杯 提交于 2019-12-03 11:02:02
I have a commercial Java application which I will be distributing . I want to use an LGPL'd java library. I wont be modifying the library. Does the LGPL license of that library have any impact on my application's license? Yes, it does to a certain degree. You are e.g required to allow people to upgrade the LGPL'd library without your help. I suggest reading through the whole license yourself, as you're legally obligated to adhere to it's clauses. Know what you oblige yourself to, don't just take other people's words for it :) As far as I understand the LGPL, no, you can distribute it however

Qt, LGPL, Commercial closed-source application [closed]

由 烂漫一生 提交于 2019-12-03 09:16:23
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. We have a commercial windows application making use of Qt. I'll be very simplistic in my description as I must have a clear answer. At compile time we use Qt *.lib files We have a result of our compilation is an *.exe file, we wrap into an installer and ship to clients. This *.exe files depends on *.DLL files in Qt. at runtime the *.dll files of Qt are used My questions are: Can I legally bundle the Qt *.dll files in my

LGPL/GPL licensing [closed]

由 泪湿孤枕 提交于 2019-12-03 03:17:12
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. I have a commercial web app that uses a component under LGPL. Since this component has a plug in architecture, I have now created a plug for this component that use a library (LGPL). This library uses a data source which is GPL. Does this mean I have to free the source for my web app? or is it just necessary to release the source for the plug in? Thanks for any input and advice, and forgive me for my poor English. To be

2D Geometry library: LGPL alternative to CGAL? [closed]

由 时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-12-03 01:20:11
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 5 years ago . CGAL seems to do just about everything I need and a little more for my upcoming project. It can create polygons out of arc line segments and run boolean operations on them. It has spatial sorting packages already that would save me a lot of time regarding a few things and the whole library seems quite
订阅 lgpl