inline

问题 I know placing all your styles in a CSS file is the best thing to do as it is a lot neater. But does it REALLY matter if the styles are inline or in a CSS????? Edit below My plan is to just place the styles in my MasterPage and all other pages will use the MasterPage....I believe the correct term is not "INLINE" but Embedded??? 回答1: Using Inline CSS: Repeat the same rule for every element in the page. More code and bigger file size to transfer to the client. Harder to maintain, suppose you

问题 I am aware that the keyword inline has useful properties e.g. for keeping template specializations inside a header file. On the other hand I have often read that inline is almost useless as hint for the compiler to actually inline functions. Further the keyword cannot be used inside a cpp file since the compiler wants to inspect functions marked with the inline keyword whenever they are called. Hence I am a little confused about the "automatic" inlining capabilities of modern compilers

问题 I am trying to learn C. Reading through some code, I came across a line like this: __inline__ void () ... What does the __inline__ mean?. How does putting that word in front of a function make it different? 回答1: __inline__ is a non-standard extension. Typically, it tells the compiler: "inline this function", but being a non-standard extension we can't say with certainty unless we know which compiler this is on. To inline is to remove the function call and place it's contents directly where

问题 Suppose we have 3 methods: method 2 is called from method 1, method 3 is called from method 2. Methods 2 and 3 are of size 30 bytecodes each. Also, suppose for definiteness method 2 is always called from method 1 exactly once, and method 3 is always called from method 2 exaclty once. If method 2 is inlined first, method 3 will be called from the body of method 1 directly, and could be inlined in its turn. If method 3 is inlined into method 2 first, the size of the latter will become about 60

问题 I have some inlines in one of my admin models which have default values which likely won't need to be changed when adding a new instance with "Add another ...". Unfortunately django won't recognize these inline as new objects unless some value has changed. This forces me to add an inline, change an arbitrary value, save, change the value back and save again to reach the desired effect. The only solution i've come up with so far is to add a hidden 'changed'-field wich would be populated via

问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 6 years ago . The title sums up my question. An example that demonstrates the point would be nice. 回答1: First off, there doesn't seem to be a consensus definition for inline functions in JavaScript. I consider an inline function to be a special case of a JavaScript function. An inline function is a function assigned to a

问题 How much faster is it to use a base64/line to display images than opposed to simply linking to the hard file on the server? url(data:image/png;base64,.......) I haven't been able to find any type of performance metrics on this. I have a few concerns: You no longer gain the benefit of caching Isn't a base64 A LOT larger in size than what a PNG/JPEG file size? Let's define "faster" as in: the time it takes for a user to see a full rendered HTML web page 回答1: 'Faster' is a hard thing to answer

问题 Consider this case: public Class1 { public static final String ONE = "ABC"; public static final String TWO = "DEF"; } public Class2 { public void someMethod() { System.out.println(Class1.ONE + Class1.TWO); } } Typically you would expect the compiler to inline the ONE and TWO constants. However, is this behavior guaranteed? Can you deploy at runtime Class2 without Class1 in the classpath, and expect it to work regardless of compilers, or is this an optional compiler optimization? EDIT: Why on

问题 I need to evaluate a function (posterior distribution) which requires long loops. Clearly I don't want to do this within R itself, and so I'm using "inline" and "Rcpp" to implement C++. However, I'm finding that in the case where each loop uses an R function, the cxxfunction is running just as slow as running the R code (see code and output below). In particular, I'm needing to use a multivariate normal cumulative distribution function within each loop, and so I'm using pmvnorm() from the

问题 Consider the following inlined function : // Inline specifier version #include<iostream> #include<cstdlib> inline int f(const int x); inline int f(const int x) { return 2*x; } int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { return f(std::atoi(argv[1])); } and the constexpr equivalent version : // Constexpr specifier version #include<iostream> #include<cstdlib> constexpr int f(const int x); constexpr int f(const int x) { return 2*x; } int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { return f(std::atoi(argv[1])); } My