clone

circular objects, illegal isArrayLike() invocation and Infinite $digest loop creating a <div> with ngReact

无人久伴 提交于 2019-12-02 07:32:55
[UPDATED Sept, 24] I am trying to use ngReact instead of ngRepeat to improve performance when I modify my $watched array of objects. For each object (a map marker) contained in the controller, I want to create a <button> , with the marker.title as text. For this purpose, I crated a React component that $watches an array of markers. Such a contains a list of , one for each marker. I supposed that the component will result changed only if I modify the list of markers, and then the list of buttons. However this is not the case. [TypeError]: Illegal invocation at isArrayLike (angular.js:274) at

Scala method clone in class Object cannot be accessed in T Access to protected method clone not permitted because

你离开我真会死。 提交于 2019-12-02 06:28:03
问题 I've got troubles with cloning in Scala. Is this possible to clone an object of an arbitrary type T? Something like this: import collection.immutable.Stack object Tester extends App { trait Grand[T <: Cloneable] { val stack = Stack[T]() val h: T def snapshot() { stack push h.clone().asInstanceOf[T] } } } however it throws: scala: method clone in class Object cannot be accessed in T Access to protected method clone not permitted because prefix type T does not conform to trait Grand in object

The copy constructor creates dependent copy

最后都变了- 提交于 2019-12-02 05:47:52
I implemented the copy constructor as it is described here . But still the problem is that when I update route_copy , then the same update is applied to route . So, I don't understand what is wrong in my code? public class Route implements Comparable<Route> { private List<Site> sites; public Route() { sites = new ArrayList<Site>(); } public Route(List<Site> sites) { this.sites = sites; } /** * Copy constructor */ public Route(Route r) { this(r.sites); } public void deleteSite(Site s) { this.sites.remove(s); } } public processData(Route route) { Route route_copy = new Route(route); Site s =

Can I use assign to duplicate an object of objects?

和自甴很熟 提交于 2019-12-02 04:50:43
问题 I have an object that inherits in 3rd degree from TPersistent and I want to clone it using the Assign procedure. MyFirstObj := GrandSonOfPersistent.Create(); //I modify the objects inside MyFirstObj MySecondObj := GrandSonOfPersistent.Create(); MySecondObj.Assign(MyFirstObject); How can I check it worked? Does it work when the objects have many other objects? I am trying to clone an object, is this the correct way to do it? 回答1: Assign is a virtual method. Any descendent classes that inherit

Deep cloning an object : Clone vs Serialize

假如想象 提交于 2019-12-02 04:33:33
I have this function duplicateCourseAction whose goal is to ... duplicate a Course object public function duplicateCourseAction(Request $request) { if ($this->getRequest()->isXmlHttpRequest() == false) { return new Response("Bad request", 405); } $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager(); $parameters = $request->request->all(); $course = $em->getRepository('EntTimeBundle:Course')->findOneById($parameters['id']); $duplicate = clone $course; $duplicate->setDate(new \DateTime($parameters['date'])); $em->persist($duplicate); $em->flush(); return new Response("200"); } According to documentations,

C++ elegantly clone derived class by calling base class

不想你离开。 提交于 2019-12-02 04:30:31
问题 I have a need to clone a derived class given only a reference or pointer to the base class. The following code does the job, but doesn't seem elegant, because I'm putting boilerplate code into many derived classes C, D, E that are siblings of B (not shown) that just calls the default copy constructor of each. Isn't that what the default copy constructor is for, if only it could be virtual? Is there a better way? Making a virtual assignment operator would be wrong, as I don't want C to assign

Cloning div containing kendo inputs

柔情痞子 提交于 2019-12-02 03:43:59
I have an application which allows users to dynamically create divs containing kendo inputs. To do so I have a div which contains multiple kendo inputs which I use as a sort of template. When the user decides to add a section to the page, i clone my div using jquery.clone(). Everything looks fine in the UI, but since the kendo inputs only get initialized one time in HTML and are then copied, the inputs are not rebuilt therefore the initial ID is not unique and the inputs are not functional. I tried to fix this programmatically by doing var $kendoInputs = $$(".draggableContainer .k-input"); for

Copy of arraylist keeps getting modified to the values of the original

删除回忆录丶 提交于 2019-12-02 03:06:49
问题 I'm working on a system for saving and recalling screen states, this is my first time messing with this kind of stuff so I'm not really sure what the best way to go about this is but I currently store all the "PreviewMonitor" objects (about 40 or so) inside of an array list. The problem is that when I create a copy of the ArrayList titled "allPreviewMonitors" to be stored I end up with an ArrayList with elements that are constantly changing as they original elements are updated. It's almost

Scala method clone in class Object cannot be accessed in T Access to protected method clone not permitted because

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-12-02 02:52:28
I've got troubles with cloning in Scala. Is this possible to clone an object of an arbitrary type T? Something like this: import collection.immutable.Stack object Tester extends App { trait Grand[T <: Cloneable] { val stack = Stack[T]() val h: T def snapshot() { stack push h.clone().asInstanceOf[T] } } } however it throws: scala: method clone in class Object cannot be accessed in T Access to protected method clone not permitted because prefix type T does not conform to trait Grand in object Tester where the access take place What goes wrong there? Mitrakov Artem I was advised on this question.

Why is the Object class's clone() method giving a deep copy of object?

拈花ヽ惹草 提交于 2019-12-02 02:05:45
As per the JAVA documentation, the super.clone() when called returns a shallow copy of the object. In the code below I have two objects name and id ; and one primitive variable num . When the super.clone() method is called on the first object, it seems to be creating a deep copy of the objects(name and id) in addition to an expected copy of only num. After cloning the object obj, I have changed its name and id fields. These changes should be reflected in the cloned object if a shallow copy was being made. Am I right? public class Cloning implements Cloneable { String name; int num; Integer id;