client-side-templating

Client side and Server side rendering of ejs template

£可爱£侵袭症+ 提交于 2019-11-28 10:39:48
问题 I always wanted to learn NodeJS to be able to run the same code on server and client side. I am using NodeJS with Express and EJS. So. I have a .ejs page with lot's of HTML, JS, CSS and a small bit with template. For the sake of justice let it be like this: the_list-->some.ejs <ul> <% for(i=0;i>the_list.length;i++) { %> <li>the_list[i]</li> <% } %> </ul> After some rendering on the server we have a perfect list. So. Now I want to rerender it on the client. I made some ajax request and now I

Basic Example of Client Side Templating with Dust.js

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2019-11-27 21:11:26
问题 This is my first foray into client-side templating and I want to make sure I'm understanding it and using it correctly. After reading this LinkedIn engineering blog, I decided to go with dust.js rather than mustache or handlebars. Note that this stackoverflow post answered many of my questions, but I still have a few things I want to clarify. In the environment I work in I have no access to anything on the server side, so everything I create has to be able to run entirely in the client's

What are the differences between Mustache.js and Handlebars.js?

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-11-27 09:57:29
Major differences I've seen are: Handlebars adds #if , #unless , #with , and #each Handlebars adds helpers Handlebars templates are compiled (Mustache can be too) Handlebars supports paths Allows use of {{this}} in blocks (which outputs the current item's string value) Handlebars.SafeString() (and maybe some other methods) Handlebars is 2 to 7 times faster Mustache supports inverted sections (i.e. if !x ... ) (Please correct me if I'm wrong with the above.) Are there any other major differences I am missing? frontendbeauty You've pretty much nailed it, however Mustache templates can also be

Unique ids in knockout.js templates

强颜欢笑 提交于 2019-11-27 03:41:21
Suppose I have knockout.js template like this: <script type="text/html" id="mytemplate"> <label for="inputId">Label for input</label> <input type="text" id="inputId" data-bind="value: inputValue"/> </script> If I render this template in several places on the page I end up with several inputs with the same id (and several labels with the same for value), which has bad consequences. In particular, all code that depends on ids may not work properly (in my case I use jquery.infieldlabel plugin that gets confused by multiple inputs with the same id). The way I solve this issue now is I add unique

What are the differences between Mustache.js and Handlebars.js?

╄→尐↘猪︶ㄣ 提交于 2019-11-26 14:58:31
问题 Major differences I've seen are: Handlebars adds #if , #unless , #with , and #each Handlebars adds helpers Handlebars templates are compiled (Mustache can be too) Handlebars supports paths Allows use of {{this}} in blocks (which outputs the current item's string value) Handlebars.SafeString() (and maybe some other methods) Handlebars is 2 to 7 times faster Mustache supports inverted sections (i.e. if !x ... ) (Please correct me if I'm wrong with the above.) Are there any other major

Unique ids in knockout.js templates

こ雲淡風輕ζ 提交于 2019-11-26 10:36:22
问题 Suppose I have knockout.js template like this: <script type=\"text/html\" id=\"mytemplate\"> <label for=\"inputId\">Label for input</label> <input type=\"text\" id=\"inputId\" data-bind=\"value: inputValue\"/> </script> If I render this template in several places on the page I end up with several inputs with the same id (and several labels with the same for value), which has bad consequences. In particular, all code that depends on ids may not work properly (in my case I use jquery