class-extensions

Swift and using class extension

孤街醉人 提交于 2019-11-27 15:03:46
I don't understand why programmers use the extension keyword in their class implementation. You can read in other topics that code is then more semantically separated and etc. But when I work with my own code, it feels clearer to me to use // MARK - Something . Then when you use methods list (ctrl+6) in Xcode, everything is seen at first look. In Apple documentation you can read: “Extensions add new functionality to an existing class, structure, or enumeration type.” So why not write my own code directly inside my own class? Unlike when I want to extend functionality of some foreign class,

Objective-C class extension

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-11-27 11:32:24
问题 As a fairly new objective-c programmer (with a 4 years Java experience), I seem to be having a hard time understanding when to use class extensions. From what I understood (and please, correct me if I'm wrong), the main difference between categories and extensions is that the extension expects you to implement the methods inside your main implementation, whereas with a category, it can be in another implementation. It also seems that people are using extensions mainly for private methods.

Class extension vs class category

戏子无情 提交于 2019-11-27 10:14:28
Class extensions @interface Class () are a lot more powerful and can inject variables into the class. Categories @interface Class (Category) can't. What other differences are there, and when should one use a category over a class extension? The main difference is that with an extension, the compiler will expect you to implement the methods within your main @implementation , whereas with a category you have a separate @implementation block. So you should pretty much only use an extension at the top of your main .m file (the only place you should care about ivars, incidentally) -- it's meant to

Identity 2.0: Creating custom ClaimsIdentity eg: User.Identity.GetUserById<int>(int id) for Per Request Validation

狂风中的少年 提交于 2019-11-27 03:06:24
问题 See this similar question: Need access more user properties in User.Identity I would like to create custom authentication methods to use with my Razor Views that allows easy access IdentityUser properties relational to the User.Identity object but I am not sure how to go about it. I want to create several custom extensions similar to User.Identity.GetUserName() , User.Identity.GetUserById() , etc... instead of using this ViewContextExtension method. My Authentication type is currently the

Class extension vs class category

空扰寡人 提交于 2019-11-26 15:07:51
问题 Class extensions @interface Class () are a lot more powerful and can inject variables into the class. Categories @interface Class (Category) can't. What other differences are there, and when should one use a category over a class extension? 回答1: The main difference is that with an extension, the compiler will expect you to implement the methods within your main @implementation , whereas with a category you have a separate @implementation block. So you should pretty much only use an extension