anonymous

Consider the following snippet: void Foo() // 1 { } namespace { void Foo() // 2 { } } int main() { Foo(); // Ambiguous. ::Foo(); // Calls the Foo in the global namespace (Foo #1). // I'm trying to call the `Foo` that's defined in the anonymous namespace (Foo #2). } How can I refer to something inside an anonymous namespace in this case? You can't. The standard contains the following section ( §7.3.1.1 , C++03): An unnamed-namespace-definition behaves as if it were replaced by namespace unique { /* empty body */ } using namespace unique; namespace unique { namespace-body } where all occurrences

Let's say I have the following piece of code: string SomeConst = "OtherName"; var persons = GetPersons(); //returns list of Person var q = persons.Select(p => new { SomeConst = p.Name }); Basically I'd expect to have in q sequence of anonymous type with the property named OtherName and not SomeConst . How can I achieve such a behaviour? You can't do that. The names of the properties of an anonymous type must be known at compile time. Why exactly do you need to do that? You could achieve a similar effect by creating a sequence of dictionaries instead of anonymous objects: string SomeConst =

I have the following question: How are anonymous structures (or unions) properly initialized according to the current C1X draft ? Is this legal: struct foo { int a; struct { int i; int j; }; int b; }; struct foo f = { 1, 2, 3, 4 }; struct foo g = { 1, { 2 }, 3 }; In GCC, g.j == 0 and g.b == 3 , while in tcc g.j == 3 and g.b == 0 . The current draft says: "[...] unnamed members of objects of structure and union type do not participate in initialization. Unnamed members of structure objects have indeterminate value even after initialization.". Can this be really true? Isn't struct foo h = { 0 };

In C++, putting a function or a variable in an anonymous namespace makes its linkage internal, i. e. the same as declaring it static on a file-level, but idiomatic C++. What about an anonymous namespace within a normal namespace? Does it still guarantee internal linkage? // foo.cpp void func1() { // external linkage } static void func2() { // internal linkage } namespace { void func3() { // internal linkage } } namespace ns1 { void func4() { // external linkage } namespace { void func3() { // still internal linkage? } } } legends2k C++11 (draft N3337) §3.5/4: (emphasis mine) An unnamed

I would like to contribute anonymously to projects on github. Not to cause mischief, more in the spirit of anonymous donations. The tool of choice for being anonymous online seems to be TOR, which works well for almost anything you can do in a browser. However, to contribute on github, it appears necessary to use the command line interface, or the Mac app. How can I channel my git operations in this setup through Tor? And how can I verify that this is actually what is happening? Edit: please note the difference between pseudonymous (with a fake e-mail address) and anonymous (with an IP address

i give users special URL with access key in it. users accessing the public page via this special url should be able to see some additional data as compared to simple anonymous user. i want to give some additional role to anonymous user based on parameters provided in request so i can do something like this in my template: <@sec.authorize ifAnyGranted="ROLE_ADMIN, ROLE_USER, ROLE_INVITED_VISITOR"> ...some additional stuff for invited user to see </@sec.authorize> currently i'm implementing Spring's OncePerRequestfilter : protected void doFilterInternal(HttpServletRequest request,

I need to define some constant strings that will be used only by one class. It looks like I have three options: Embed the strings directly into locations where they are used. Define them as private static constant members of the class: //A.h class A { private: static const std::string f1; static const std::string f2; static const std::string f3; }; //A.cpp const std::string f1 = "filename1"; const std::string f2 = "filename2"; const std::string f3 = "filename3"; //strings are used in this file Define them in an anonymous namespace in the cpp file: //A.cpp namespace { const std::string f1 =

Further to this post whose accepted answer remains very cryptic: @Button1.OnClick := pPointer(Cardinal(pPointer( procedure (sender: tObject) begin ((sender as TButton).Owner as TForm).Caption := 'Freedom to anonymous methods!' end )^ ) + $0C)^; I wonder wether it is possible to devise a simplest and elegant way akin to: Button.OnClick := AnonProc2NotifyEvent ( procedure (Sender: TObject) begin ((Sender as TButton).Owner as TForm).Caption := 'Freedom to anonymous methods!' end ); so as to attain the same purpose and where AnonProc2NotifyEvent is a method of the owner of Button with the