anonymous

I'm just curious why one would choose to use an anonymous subroutine, versus a named one, in Perl. Thanks. innaM You can store anonymous subs in arrays, hashes and scalars. You can build them at runtime You can pass them as arguments to other functions. You get to keep variables in the surrounding scope. The last point is probably the most important, because it's often the most unexpected facet of named vs. anonymous subroutines in Perl. Example: sub outer { my $a = 123; sub inner { print $a, "\n"; } # At this point, $a is 123, so this call should always print 123, right? inner(); $a = 456; }

The title sums up my question. An example that demonstrates the point would be nice. Daniel Gimenez First off, there doesn't seem to be a consensus definition for inline functions in JavaScript. I consider an inline function to be a special case of a JavaScript function. An inline function is a function assigned to a variable that is created at runtime instead of at parsetime. Anonymous functions and inline functions are practically the same, in that they are created at runtime. The difference is that an inline function is assigned to a variable and so it can be reused. In that way, inline

I've created one WCF service and deployed it on Server. When I browse this service it gives me positive response with ?wsdl URL. Now I'm trying to test the service through WCF Test client. It shows proper metadata. But when I try to invoke any of the method from the service it shows me an exception... here are the erro details with stack trace.. The HTTP request is unauthorized with client authentication scheme 'Anonymous'. The authentication header received from the server was 'Negotiate,NTLM'. Server stack trace: at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelUtilities.ValidateAuthentication

I have received the following error message when trying to debug an application in NetBeans: java.io.WriteAbortedException: writing aborted; java.io.NotSerializableException: board.Board$1 In the course of debugging I have had to insert 'implements Serializable' in a number of classes as the exception arose in the course of reading from a file that stores a large object. This has not been difficult as the class needing attention has been clear from the exception message. What has thrown me is the apparent anonymous inner class 'Board$1'. I can't for the life of me identify the source with

I have a third party Java library which an object with interface like this: public interface Handler<C> { void call(C context) throws Exception; } How can I concisely implement it in Kotlin similar to Java anonymous class like this: Handler<MyContext> handler = new Handler<MyContext> { @Override public void call(MyContext context) throws Exception { System.out.println("Hello world"); } } handler.call(myContext) // Prints "Hello world" Assuming the interface has only a single method you can make use of SAM val handler = Handler<String> { println("Hello: $it")} If you have a method that accepts

I'm updating a struct of mine and I was wanting to add a std::string member to it. The original struct looks like this: struct Value { uint64_t lastUpdated; union { uint64_t ui; int64_t i; float f; bool b; }; }; Just adding a std::string member to the union, of course, causes a compile error, because one would normally need to add the non-trivial constructors of the object. In the case of std::string (text from informit.com) Since std::string defines all of the six special member functions, U will have an implicitly deleted default constructor, copy constructor, copy assignment operator, move