Why doesn't this code attempting to use Hamcrest's hasItems compile?

问题

Why does this not compile, oh, what to do?

import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;
import static org.junit.matchers.JUnitMatchers.hasItems;

ArrayList<Integer> actual = new ArrayList<Integer>();
ArrayList<Integer> expected = new ArrayList<Integer>();
actual.add(1);
expected.add(2);
assertThat(actual, hasItems(expected));

error copied from comment:

cannot find symbol method assertThat(java.util.ArrayList<java.lang.Integer>, org.hamcreset.Matcher<java.lang.Iterable<java.util.ArrayList<java.lang.Integer>>>)

回答1:

Just ran into this post trying to fix it for myself. Gave me just enough information to work it out.

You can give the compiler just enough to persuade it to compile by casting the return value from hasItems to a (raw) Matcher, eg:

ArrayList<Integer> actual = new ArrayList<Integer>();
ArrayList<Integer> expected = new ArrayList<Integer>();
actual.add(1);
expected.add(2);
assertThat(actual, (Matcher) hasItems(expected));

Just in case anybody else is still suffering ...

Edit to add: In spite of the up votes, this answer is wrong, as Arend points out below. The correct answer is to turn the expected into an array of Integers, as hamcrest is expecting:

    ArrayList<Integer> actual = new ArrayList<Integer>();
    ArrayList<Integer> expected = new ArrayList<Integer>();
    actual.add(1);
    expected.add(2);
    assertThat(actual, hasItems(expected.toArray(new Integer[expected.size()])));

回答2:

hasItems checks that a collection contains some items, not that 2 collections are equal, just use the normal equality assertions for that. So either assertEquals(a, b) or using assertThat

import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.is;

ArrayList<Integer> actual = new ArrayList<Integer>();
ArrayList<Integer> expected = new ArrayList<Integer>();
actual.add(1);
expected.add(2);
assertThat(actual, is(expected));

Alternatively, use the contains Matcher, which checks that an Iterable contains items in a specific order

import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.contains;

ArrayList<Integer> actual = new ArrayList<Integer>();
actual.add(1);
actual.add(2);
assertThat(actual, contains(1, 2)); // passes
assertThat(actual, contains(3, 4)); // fails

If you don't care about the order use containsInAnyOrder instead.

回答3:

You are comparing ArrayList<Integer> with int. The correct comparison is:

...
assertThat(actual, hasItem(2));

-- Edit --

I'm sorry, I've read it wrong. Anyway, the signature of hasItems you want is:

public static <T> org.hamcrest.Matcher<java.lang.Iterable<T>> hasItems(T... elements)

i.e., it accepts a variable number of arguments. I'm not sure if an ArrayList<T> is compatible, just guessing here. Try sending each item from the expected list interspersed by comma.

assertThat(actual, hasItems(2,4,1,5,6));

-- Edit 2 --

Just pasting here my comment, there is an equivalent expression for what you want, without using Hamcrest:

assertTrue(actual.containsAll(expected));

回答4:

Try

assertThat(actual, hasItems(expected.toArray(new Integer[0])));

to satisfy the matcher signature. No Eclipse around, so this might not work.

回答5:

That error message looks like one produced by the javac compiler. I've found in the past that code written using hamcrest just won't compile under javac. The same code will compile fine under, say, the Eclipse compiler.

I think Hamcrest's generics are exercising corner cases in generics that javac can't deal with.

回答6:

I just came across the same problem and the following trick worked for me:

use import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.hasItems
have the hamcrest library before junit in classpath (build path -> order and export)

回答7:

You can get this error if you try to replace jUnit's hamcrest with a newer version. For example, using junit-dep together with hamcrest 1.3 requires that use assertThat from hamcrest instead of jUnit.

So the solution is to use

import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;

instead of

import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;

回答8:

For these cases when code does compile in Eclipse but javac shows errors please do help hamcrest by providing explicitly type parameter e.g. Matchers.hasItem()

回答9:

ArrayList<Integer> expected = new ArrayList<Integer>();
expected.add(1);
expected.add(2);
hasItems(expected);

hasItems(T..t) is being expanded by the compiler to:

hasItems(new ArrayList<Integer>[]{expected});

You are passing a single element array containing an ArrayList. If you change the ArrayList to an Array, then your code will work.

Integer[] expected = new Integer[]{1, 2};
hasItems(expected);

This will be expanded to:

hasItems(1, 2);

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1092981/why-doesnt-this-code-attempting-to-use-hamcrests-hasitems-compile

标签

java

unit-testing

junit

hamcrest

matcher