I tried the matlab's convolution function conv2 convn with gpuArray. For example convn(gpuArray.rand(100,100,10,'single'),gpuArray.rand(5,'single') and compared it to the cpu version convn(rand(100,100,10),rand(5)). Unfortunately the gpu version is much slower than the cpu version, especially noticeable when I put the function for example into a loop(which will be relevant for me). Does anyone know an alternative to fast convolution using matlab and the gpu for relatively small filtering kernels from 5x5 to 14x14?
The GPU performance is limited by the data array size [100x100x10] and [5x5] in your test case.
The actual performance also depends on the GPU and CPU module type. For your data size (test case 2 of the following code), I can get a performance improvement (2.75x) on GPU Tesla M2090 and CPU Xeon E5-2609.
For the following matlab test code
m=1000;
n=100;
k=5;
gc=convn(gpuArray.rand(m,m,10,'single'),gpuArray.rand(k,'single'));
tic;
for i=1:n
gc=convn(gpuArray.rand(m,m,10,'single'),gpuArray.rand(k,'single'));
end
toc
c=convn(rand(m,m,10,'single'),rand(k,'single'));
tic;
for i=1:n
c=convn(rand(m,m,10,'single'),rand(k,'single'));
end
toc
When m=1000; n=100; k=5; I got very good performance improvement (11.6x) on GPU.
Elapsed time is 2.367453 seconds.
Elapsed time is 27.502952 seconds.
But when m=100; n=1000; k=5; I got only 2.75x
Elapsed time is 1.206053 seconds.
Elapsed time is 3.330559 seconds.
When m=100; n=1000; k=14;, it becomes better (4.84x).
Elapsed time is 2.804957 seconds.
Elapsed time is 13.585698 seconds.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19477224/matlab-convolution-using-gpu