问题
I have seen the documentation of pthread_create
In the example at the bottom they are using:
pthread_create(&tinfo[tnum].thread_id, &attr, &thread_start, &tinfo[tnum]);
&thread_start - with &
but in other examples I have seen online they were not using the &:
pthread_create(&tinfo[tnum].thread_id, &attr, thread_start, &tinfo[tnum]);
I have also tested and it works without &.
But which is the correct way?
回答1:
Short answer: both are correct.
The signature of pthread_create is:
int pthread_create(pthread_t *thread, const pthread_attr_t *attr,
void *(*start_routine) (void *), void *arg);
So start_routine is a function pointer that takes a void * argument and returns void *.
Back to your question, I assume thread_start is the name of the function, so &thread_start is a function pointer which is correct.
However, thread_start is correct, too, because the function name is automatically converted to a function pointer.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28148395/what-is-the-correct-argument-to-pthread-create