x86-64

How can you list all functions in a program with GDB? info functions prints the names and data types of all defined functions. See 16 Examining the Symbol Table . 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10680670/ask-gdb-to-list-all-functions-in-a-program

I am trying to write inline assembly with my C code to perform compare and swap operation. My code is: typedef struct node { int data; struct node * next; struct node * backlink; int flag; int mark; } node_lf; typedef struct searchfrom { node_lf * current; node_lf * next; } return_sf; typedef struct csArg { node_lf * node; int mark; int flag; } cs_arg; typedef struct return_tryFlag { node_lf * node; int result; } return_tf; static inline node_lf cs(node_lf * address, cs_arg *old_val, cs_arg *new_val) { node_lf value = *address; __asm__ __volatile__("lock; cmpxchg16b %0; setz %1;" :"=m"(*

One way to get cmake to build x86 on Windows with Visual Studio is like so: Start Visual Studio Command prompt for x86 Run cmake: cmake -G "NMake Makefiles" \path_to_source\ nmake One way to get cmake to build x64 on Windows with Visual Studio is like so: Start Visual Studio Command prompt for x64 Run cmake: cmake -G "NMake Makefiles" \path_to_source\ nmake Using Cmake, how do I compile either or both architectures? (like how Visual Studio does it from in the IDE) This cannot be done with CMake. You have to generate two separate build folders. One for the x86 NMake build and one for the x64

Im very new to assembly but know a bit of c. Im playing around with extern function calls like extern _printf str db "Hello", 0 push str call _printf but cant find any tutorials using extern functions except scanf and printf. For example strcmp? How can i call strcmp in my case? Micrified Here is my answer. It is specific to x86-64 though. Please know that when pushing arguments to a function, you usually place the first 6 in registers rdi , rsi , rdx , rcx , r8 , and r9 . The rest get pushed to the stack. The specification for this is called the System V ABI (Note that Windows uses a

Recently I've been reading some SO archives and encountered statements against the x86 architecture. Why do we need different CPU architecture for server & mini/mainframe & mixed-core? says " PC architecture is a mess, any OS developer would tell you that. " Is learning Assembly Language worth the effort? ( archived ) says " Realize that the x86 architecture is horrible at best " Any easy way to learn x86 assembler? says " Most colleges teach assembly on something like MIPS because it's much simpler to understand, x86 assembly is really ugly " and many more comments like "Compared to most

I came accross a problem with debugging a 64 bit binary in Windows using IDA. Normally, after a push RSP value should be deducted by 8. But occasionally, from IDA I saw that RSP was only deducted by 2, and then 8 for the next Push. The codes involved are push rax push rbx push rsi push rdi I'm quite new to x64 environment, thus could anyone explain this behavior ? You're probably getting mixed up by hexadecimal. Counting by 8 goes 0 8 10 18 20 28 30 Are you looking at that and thinking 10 - 8 == 2 ? Because it's 0x10 - 0x8 == 0x8 . 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35958737/intel-64-bits