workflow

问题 I'm thinking of asking my students to use git for pair programming. Because student work has to be secret, a public repo is out of the question. Instead, each student will have a private repo they maintain themselves, and they will need to exchange patches using git-format-patch. I've read the man page but I'm a little unclear which patches will be sent. The obvious thing for the students would be send all patches since the last send or (if git doesn't mind receiving the same patches

问题 I'm trying to refine a personal git workflow to something a little easier to deal with. Here's some background of how I'm using git for purposes of this post: A single developer who is the only one working on the repository. A single copy of the repository that is stored on the local machine. Only two branches "dev" and "master". All work done on "dev". What I'm trying to accomplish is to get to the point where the only commits made to the "master" branch are working production versions based

问题 You can see all over the web people advising to not use git rebase in a public branch, but I can't see what's the problem, if you always rebase a feature branch. My team always uses branches for features (wow), we are used to have it just locally, so rebase isn't a problem, but sometimes we wanna show the code of a partially done feature to another developer, so we just publicize it, but then we lose all of the advantages of git rebase , or at least that's what you can read at the web. I don

问题 I'm monitoring for either Workflow Task Change Workflow Item Change OnApprovalTaskChanged is being fired, but not onWorkflowItemChanged. Is this a known issue and what could be a workaround? If i remove ListenActivity, onWorkflowItemChanged gets triggered! Here is part of my workflow: Workflow diagram http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/8397/ss20100217113727.png 回答1: Solved this issue. This article helped me. What you must do is to set InitializeWorkflow activity and create new correlation token

问题 I'm searching for a workflow library/framework for Python. I'm astonished that there I cannot find anything which is simple and not attached to Zope/Plone. Does anyone know of an open-source, simple workflow library/framework. It's preferred to support Django, but not required. 回答1: Try GoFlow, a workflow engine for Django. 回答2: Unfortunately it seems like most/all of the projects listed here are no longer active. Here's a new project which is currently ongoing: http://packages.python.org

问题 I'm searching for a workflow library/framework for Python. I'm astonished that there I cannot find anything which is simple and not attached to Zope/Plone. Does anyone know of an open-source, simple workflow library/framework. It's preferred to support Django, but not required. 回答1: Try GoFlow, a workflow engine for Django. 回答2: Unfortunately it seems like most/all of the projects listed here are no longer active. Here's a new project which is currently ongoing: http://packages.python.org

问题 This has been bothering me since I started working with this webapp last year (I had no experience with web development) I don't know if this app is structured incorrectly or if this is just the way it is . My welcome page is really a login page, and after the user logs in my app goes to a main page, where they have a menu to go to various other functions. This is struts.xml : <action name="Welcome"> <interceptor-ref name="newStack" /> <result name="success">Login.jsp</result> </action>

问题 I have a web app under source control in git. I have different css files for different customers as well as images and other theme specific things. And also custom reports... Beside the theme things every other aspect of the app stays the same. What would be a recommended way to keep the app as well as the theme information under source control in git. Should I use branches for the theme and the reports or submodules... During development I would like to like my customers theme to to my dev

问题 I am new to Python as I want to expand skills that I learned using R. In R I tend to load a bunch of libraries, sometimes resulting in function name conflicts. What is best practice in Python. I have seen some specific variations that I do not see a difference between import pandas , from pandas import * , and from pandas import DataFrame What are the differences between the first two and should I just import what I need. Also, what would be the worst consequences for someone making small

问题 Let's say I have a commit history with 5 commits. I know that I can rebase my commits locally when making a pull request which will then have them rebased into a single commit. A common use case for this is: Make local commits, working on feature Squash commits Make Pull Request Receive review comments Update PR appropriately I can do this locally on my machine and then push my change again (using -f since the rebase makes it out of sync with the remote). This is kind of annoying. However,