verbosity

问题 Using gcloud auth ... you can add or remove accounts used during the gcloud commands. Is there a way to get the active account without grep -ing and awk -ing? gcloud auth list is good for humans but not good enough to a machine. I want a cleaner solution. gcloud config list account also shows me to verbose output: Your active configuration is: [default] [core] account = service@<my_project>.iam.gserviceaccount.com 回答1: I found the solution: gcloud config list account --format "value(core

问题 Using gcloud auth ... you can add or remove accounts used during the gcloud commands. Is there a way to get the active account without grep -ing and awk -ing? gcloud auth list is good for humans but not good enough to a machine. I want a cleaner solution. gcloud config list account also shows me to verbose output: Your active configuration is: [default] [core] account = service@<my_project>.iam.gserviceaccount.com 回答1: I found the solution: gcloud config list account --format "value(core

问题 Using gcloud auth ... you can add or remove accounts used during the gcloud commands. Is there a way to get the active account without grep -ing and awk -ing? gcloud auth list is good for humans but not good enough to a machine. I want a cleaner solution. gcloud config list account also shows me to verbose output: Your active configuration is: [default] [core] account = service@<my_project>.iam.gserviceaccount.com 回答1: I found the solution: gcloud config list account --format "value(core

问题 Using gcloud auth ... you can add or remove accounts used during the gcloud commands. Is there a way to get the active account without grep -ing and awk -ing? gcloud auth list is good for humans but not good enough to a machine. I want a cleaner solution. gcloud config list account also shows me to verbose output: Your active configuration is: [default] [core] account = service@<my_project>.iam.gserviceaccount.com 回答1: I found the solution: gcloud config list account --format "value(core

问题 Is there a way for pytest to only output a single line assert errors? This problem arises when you have modules with asserts, If those asserts fails, it dumps the entire function that failed the asserts. > assert r.status_code == 200, f"{idtest.tools.now()} wrong status code {r.status_code}: resp:{r.text}" E AssertionError: 2019-06-11 12:41:17.239128 wrong status code 500: resp:{"timestamp":"2019-06-11T10:41:17.187+0000","status":500,"error":"Internal Server Error","message":"The user was not

问题 In my Elixir/Phoenix app, when I run mix test I get output like: $ mix test .... Finished in 0.09 seconds 4 tests, 0 failures with dots for each test that succeeded. How do I output the names of the tests that succeed instead? In Rails with rspec I used to do this with a .rspec file in the directory that looked like: $ cat .rspec --color -fd --tty Is there an equivalent in Elixir? 回答1: To print the names of the passing tests, you can pass --trace argument to mix test . For example, here's the

问题 In my Elixir/Phoenix app, when I run mix test I get output like: $ mix test .... Finished in 0.09 seconds 4 tests, 0 failures with dots for each test that succeeded. How do I output the names of the tests that succeed instead? In Rails with rspec I used to do this with a .rspec file in the directory that looked like: $ cat .rspec --color -fd --tty Is there an equivalent in Elixir? 回答1: To print the names of the passing tests, you can pass --trace argument to mix test . For example, here's the

问题 Is there a way to make unittest.TextTestRunner completely quiet, meaning it never prints to output on its own? Even at verbosity=0 it prints results when done. I want to process the TestResult object returned by the runner before anything is printed. 回答1: TextTestRunner has a stream=sys.stderr in its constructor: def __init__(self, stream=sys.stderr, descriptions=1, verbosity=1) Change it to a null stream. result = unittest.TextTestRunner(stream = open(os.devnull, 'w')).run(alltests) if len

问题 Unit test frameworks generally provide very nice assertion failure messages (I'm using gtest) describing expected and actual values to a particular test. Furthermore, you know the origin of the function call because you're testing the interface of the class. In contrast, assert , when used as a sanity check in the implementation provides some, but more cryptic information. For example, the one I'm working on now . . Assertion failed: (latency > std::chrono::milliseconds(0)), function

问题 I'm developing video game, and I'd like it to be highly modable. Currently, all my game logic is defined in Python, my engine logic in C++, and my data in XML. I'd like to explain to you how an entity is defined in my game and listen to what you think; for example, is it too verbose? First, some background: Entities are made out of components (component-based entity model). Components can be of two types: Attributes and Behaviors. Attributes are just 'dumb' data. They are things like health,