threadpool

private static void Main(string[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { Task.Factory.StartNew(() => { Thread.Sleep(1000); Console.WriteLine("hej"); Thread.Sleep(10000); }); } Console.ReadLine(); } Why this code won't print 1000 times "hej" after one second? Why Thread.Sleep(10000) has an impact on code behavior? Factory.StartNew effectively delegates the work to ThreadPool . Threadpool will create number of threads immediately to respond the request as long as threads count is less than or equal to processor count. Once it reaches processor count, threadpool will stop creating new threads

There are many places across the web and Stack Overflow where one is discouraged from changing the priority of a ThreadPool thread or TPL Task . In particular: "You have no control over the state and priority of a thread pool thread." "The runtime manages the thread pool. You have no control over the scheduling of the thread, nor can you change the thread's priority." "You should not change the Culture or Priority or... of a PoolThread. Just like you don't paint or re-decorate a rental car." "There are several scenarios in which it is appropriate to create and manage your own threads instead

I am currently thinking about how to design a multithreading system in Java that needs to do some heavy network processing and database storage. The program will launch three basic threads at first. Along these basic threads, I would like to launch other threads not from the main program but from two of the threads. Is it possible for a thread to launch another thread leading to some sort of a hierarchy like: > Parent ->t0 thread1 -> t1 tread1.1 > ->t0 thread2 > ->t0 thread3 -> t2 thread3.1 t0= inital time t1,t2 = time at a point in the running thread t1 != t2 If not could somebody provide a

Currently I´m not sure, I try to make a high-performance server, I got a 6Core CPU, so if I would use the "io_service_per_cpu" design, I have 6 io_service´s. I already heard that the threadpool design isn´t the best one, but I´m not sure about that. What knowledge do you have? Someone already made a Stress test with each, or something else? Sam Miller In my experience it is vastly easier to approach asynchronous application design with the following order: single thread and a single io_service multiple threads, each invoking io_service::run() from a single io_service . Use strands for handlers