testing

问题 Ok, I know this is considered an anti-pattern, and I am certainly open to a better way of doing this. I have a map of enum values. I want to ensure that each of those enum values is assigned to something. My test looks like this. @Test public void eachRowRequiresCellCalc() { Model model = new Model(); EnumValues[] values = EnumValues.values(); for (EnumValues value : values) { Assert.assertTrue(String.format("%s must be assigned", value.name()), model.hasEnumValue(value)); } } This works and

问题 Ok, I know this is considered an anti-pattern, and I am certainly open to a better way of doing this. I have a map of enum values. I want to ensure that each of those enum values is assigned to something. My test looks like this. @Test public void eachRowRequiresCellCalc() { Model model = new Model(); EnumValues[] values = EnumValues.values(); for (EnumValues value : values) { Assert.assertTrue(String.format("%s must be assigned", value.name()), model.hasEnumValue(value)); } } This works and

问题 I'm trying to create a random test for a "harris_corner_detector" function implementation (VERY GENERALLY AND SLIGHTLY INCORRECTLY: a function that finds corners in an image) In the test, I want to create random simple shapes in a binary numpy matrix (it's easy to know the coordinates of their corners) (e.g rectangles, triangles, rhombus (diamond) etc...) and check if the harris implementation finds the correct corners. I already implemented a function that randomly 'draws' an axis parallel

问题 Using koin-2.0.1 for Android testing and unable to test all 3 test together though each test passes separately. class NumberFormatterUtilImplTest : KoinTest { private val numberFormatterUtil: NumberFormatterUtilImpl by inject() @Before fun setUp() { startKoin { modules(utilsModule) } } @Test fun `does formatter returns two digit faction if supplied one digit value`() { val result = numberFormatterUtil.getAdjustedCurrencyRate(18.0) Assert.assertEquals(result, 18.00, 1.0) } @Test fun `does

问题 Using koin-2.0.1 for Android testing and unable to test all 3 test together though each test passes separately. class NumberFormatterUtilImplTest : KoinTest { private val numberFormatterUtil: NumberFormatterUtilImpl by inject() @Before fun setUp() { startKoin { modules(utilsModule) } } @Test fun `does formatter returns two digit faction if supplied one digit value`() { val result = numberFormatterUtil.getAdjustedCurrencyRate(18.0) Assert.assertEquals(result, 18.00, 1.0) } @Test fun `does

问题 Given a large project with thousands of tests, some of which take multiple minutes to complete. When executed sequentially, the whole set of test takes more than an hour to finish. The testing time could be reduced by executing tests in parallel. As far as I know there are no means to do that directly from googletest/mock, like a --async option. Or am I wrong? One solution is to determine the tests which can run in parallel and write a script that starts each in a separate job, i.e. ./test -

问题 I am working through the TaskBuster Django tutorial whose goal is to help in the process of setting up a good development setup for a project. When I run the command echo $SECRET_KEY In either my "Dev" environment or my "Test" environment I get the same output so I believe that my $ENVIROMENTS/bin/postactivate and predeativate variables are set up correctly. my base.py folder contains # Build paths inside the project like this: os.path.join(BASE_DIR, ...) import os BASE_DIR = os.path.dirname

问题 I am working through the TaskBuster Django tutorial whose goal is to help in the process of setting up a good development setup for a project. When I run the command echo $SECRET_KEY In either my "Dev" environment or my "Test" environment I get the same output so I believe that my $ENVIROMENTS/bin/postactivate and predeativate variables are set up correctly. my base.py folder contains # Build paths inside the project like this: os.path.join(BASE_DIR, ...) import os BASE_DIR = os.path.dirname

问题 Refer following links - GitHub discussion on how to separate Integration Tests and Unit Tests As a result, I tried this -- <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId> <configuration> <includes> <include>**/*Tests.java</include> <include>**/*Test.java</include> </includes> <excludes> <exclude>**/Abstract*.java</exclude> <exclude>**/IT*.java</exclude> <exclude>**/*IT.java</exclude> <exclude>**/*ITCase.java</exclude> <exclude>**/

问题 Refer following links - GitHub discussion on how to separate Integration Tests and Unit Tests As a result, I tried this -- <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId> <configuration> <includes> <include>**/*Tests.java</include> <include>**/*Test.java</include> </includes> <excludes> <exclude>**/Abstract*.java</exclude> <exclude>**/IT*.java</exclude> <exclude>**/*IT.java</exclude> <exclude>**/*ITCase.java</exclude> <exclude>**/