static-libraries

I have a very similar problem to one described on the cmake mailing list where we have a project dependent on many static libraries (all built from source in individual submodules, each with their own CMakeLists.txt describing the build process for each library) that I'd like to combine into a single static library for release to the consumers. The dependencies of my library are subject to change, and I do not want to burden developers further down the chain with those changes. The neat solution would be to bundle all of the libs into one single lib. Interestingly, the target_link_libraries

How can I create static library and can add just .a file on any project in ios. I tried doing this but couldn't do it. Thanks in advance if you want create static lib mean refer the link http://jaym2503.blogspot.in/2013/01/how-to-make-universal-static-library.html Step 1 : Create a New Project, Named it "Logger" Step 2 : Create Classes You can create as many classes you wants, In our tutorial we will create one class named "Logger". So, now two files should be in our resource. 1. Logger.h 2. Logger.m Step 3 : Put some useful code into Classes Step 4 : Create New Target Create New Target from

I know this question has been posed several times, but my goal is slightly different with regard to what I have found searching the web. Specifically, I am already able to build a static library for iPhone, but the final fat file I am able to build only contains arm and i386 architectures (and I am not sure to what arm refers: is v6 or v7?). I am not able to compile specifically for armv6 and armv7 and them merge both architectures using lipo. The lipo tool complains that the same architecture (arm, not armv6 or armv7) is present in both the armv6 and armv7 libraries. Can someone explain

During compilation and linking, what is use of .exp? What is the difference between .lib and .dll? I know that .lib will be used, while linking and .dll will be used when running the program. But what exactly is the difference between .lib and .dll? Does .lib file not contain the code for the functions coming from .dll files? What is the need for using two separate files? Please clarify. In the case of an import library for a DLL, the .lib file does not contain any actual code at all. It basically contains just a list of the functions in the associated DLL -- enough for the linker to embed a

Is it possible to build resources into a static library and reuse them by simply linking with the library? I'm primarily thinking about the case where you call a function in the library which in turn accesses resources. It can be done, but it's quite painful: You can't do it by simply linking with the static library. Consider this: resources are embedded in an EXE or DLL. When some code in the static library calls (e.g.) LoadIcon, it'll get the resources from the EXE or DLL that it's linked with. So, if your static library requires resources to be available, you've got a couple of options: You