state

Scenario: Take a server running .NET 3.0 and an ASP.NET Web site running in an application pool that has Web gardens enabled (number of processes: 3). The web.config configuration is as follows: <sessionState cookieless="UseCookies" cookieName=".authz" mode="StateServer" regenerateExpiredSessionId="true" stateConnectionString="tcpip=127.0.0.1:42424" timeout="60" useHostingIdentity="true" /> Now upgrade the machine to .NET 3.5 SP1. Reboot the server. Result: sessions are no longer maintained across instances of w3wp.exe, as if all of the have reverted to InProc. Reducing to 1 worker process is

enum SectionType: String, CaseIterable { case top = "Top" case best = "Best" } struct ContentView : View { @State private var selection: Int = 0 var body: some View { SegmentedControl(selection: $selection) { ForEach(SectionType.allCases.identified(by: \.self)) { type in Text(type.rawValue).tag(type) } } } } How do I run code (e.g print("Selection changed to \(selection)") when the $selection state changes? I looked through the docs and I couldn't find anything. You can't use didSet observer on @State but you can on an ObservableObject property. import SwiftUI import Combine final class

Background I create an app with a menu on the left which contains several menu items. When the user clicks on an item (or access it via an URL), I want to highlight the item (i.e. apply the class 'active' on the corresponding <li> ). Note : I handle routes with ui.router . What I tried Up to now, I try to use a ng-class directive : <div class="col-sm-3 col-md-2 sidebar"> <ul class="nav nav-sidebar"> <li ng-class="{active: current=='container.item1'}"> <a href="#/a/item1">Item 1</a> </li> <li ng-class="{active: current=='container.item2'}"> <a href="#/a/item2">Item 2</a> </li> <li ng-class="

The state parameter according to the Google Oauth 2.0 docs: Indicates any state which may be useful to your application upon receipt of the response. The Google Authorization Server roundtrips this parameter, so your application receives the same value it sent. Possible uses include redirecting the user to the correct resource in your site, nonces, and cross-site-request-forgery mitigations. I'd like to use the state parameter as a means to know which subdomain the original oauth request was initiated from. But the redirect_state parameter appears to need to be registered as part of one of the

After a long struggle with the Page Lifecycle in ASP.NET and its performance, we've begun refactoring our web app to implement web services (plain-vanilla .asmx .NET web-services) and jQuery on the client-side. NOTE: this does not implement MVC or ASP.NET in any way, these are just web services. In both dispensations of the application, we generate all content dynamically in a single page. In the ASP.NET dispensation, this meant (due to the Page Lifecycle) that the entire page needed to be torn down and rebuilt with (almost) every AJAX call or change to the web form. This presented a huge

Is there any way to check if the Android GPS is on or off without any permission, just the state I don't need to toggle it. Thanks No. Checking GPS Status on Android requires android.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION The code to check the status of GPS LocationManager manager = (LocationManager) getSystemService(Context.LOCATION_SERVICE ); boolean statusOfGPS = manager.isProviderEnabled(LocationManager.GPS_PROVIDER); steps - Create services running in backgroud You require following permission in Manifest file too - android.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION write code final LocationManager manager

Given how flexible jinja templating can be with saltstack and the numerous pillar variables are merged into the template; I would find it useful to be able to get salt to 'render' the full sls out to screen before i push it out. Is there a way of doing this? yee379 Just to answer my own question: I knew that state.show_top existed. So I tried state.show_sls , and voila! Exactly what I'm after. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34191710/how-to-render-and-dump-the-file-sls-with-salt-stack-without-applying-it