security

Google Cloud Functions - How to securely store service account private key when using Google Source Repository?

老子叫甜甜 提交于 2020-07-14 22:31:56
问题 I use Google Source Repository to store my Google Cloud Functions. (Git repo hosted by Google, basically) One of my function needs to access a private Google Sheet file, I therefore created a Service Account. (With way too many rights since it's so hard to understand what exact rights we should give to a service account, and so hard to update later on, but I digress) Now, it's clearly not recommended to store the Service Account JSON file in the git repository itself for obvious reasons. Here

Google Cloud Functions - How to securely store service account private key when using Google Source Repository?

那年仲夏 提交于 2020-07-14 22:29:39
问题 I use Google Source Repository to store my Google Cloud Functions. (Git repo hosted by Google, basically) One of my function needs to access a private Google Sheet file, I therefore created a Service Account. (With way too many rights since it's so hard to understand what exact rights we should give to a service account, and so hard to update later on, but I digress) Now, it's clearly not recommended to store the Service Account JSON file in the git repository itself for obvious reasons. Here

Configure Elasticsearch rest high level client with Basic credential provider

爷,独闯天下 提交于 2020-07-10 10:27:55
问题 This question was asked in the follow-up question to my this SO answer of how to secure JHLRC in this comment, where I explained how to send Basic Credential in Elasticsearch JHLRC request but it was not at the client level and was at the request level. I feel configure at the client level, would avoid repeating the same code again in cases, where you are dealing with only a few users it would be helpful to configure the credentials in the client itself. 回答1: You can follow the below steps as

Oracle - Why is EXECUTE IMMEDIATE allowed in stored procedures?

可紊 提交于 2020-07-09 14:42:14
问题 Why is EXECUTE IMMEDIATE allowed in stored procedures, if stored procedures are meant to mitigate SQL injection attacks? The accepted answer to the following question refers to them as a step against such attacks: What is a stored procedure? https://stackoverflow.com/a/459531/3163495 "Stored procedures also have a security benefit in that you can grant execute rights to a stored procedure but the user will not need to have read/write permissions on the underlying tables. This is a good first

Change Named Pipe Access Permissions

前提是你 提交于 2020-07-09 03:27:17
问题 I have created a named pipe using System.IO.Pipes . It worked fine until I had to run the program in admin mode. When elevated, the client can no longer connect (client is not running elevated). If I run the client as administrator, it connects fine so it looks like a permissions issue. I've been researching how to fix this and have been unsuccessful (I find dealing with Windows security mind boggling). My goal is to allow any client - whether elevated or not - to be able to connect to the

Change Named Pipe Access Permissions

空扰寡人 提交于 2020-07-09 03:26:57
问题 I have created a named pipe using System.IO.Pipes . It worked fine until I had to run the program in admin mode. When elevated, the client can no longer connect (client is not running elevated). If I run the client as administrator, it connects fine so it looks like a permissions issue. I've been researching how to fix this and have been unsuccessful (I find dealing with Windows security mind boggling). My goal is to allow any client - whether elevated or not - to be able to connect to the

Secured Android SharedPreferences Error: 'Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Field keySize_ for…'

人盡茶涼 提交于 2020-07-08 11:09:07
问题 In an Android Kotlin project, I implemented EncryptedSharedPreference feature based on this link using the androidx.security library and it worked well in debug mode. But in release mode, I keep getting this error java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at com.package_name.i.a.f(:46) at com.package_name.i.a.j(:52) at com.package_name.i.a.e(:82) at com.package_name.MyApplication.onCreate(:37) at android.app.Instrumentation.callApplicationOnCreate(Instrumentation.java:1013) at android.app

Secured Android SharedPreferences Error: 'Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Field keySize_ for…'

删除回忆录丶 提交于 2020-07-08 11:08:42
问题 In an Android Kotlin project, I implemented EncryptedSharedPreference feature based on this link using the androidx.security library and it worked well in debug mode. But in release mode, I keep getting this error java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at com.package_name.i.a.f(:46) at com.package_name.i.a.j(:52) at com.package_name.i.a.e(:82) at com.package_name.MyApplication.onCreate(:37) at android.app.Instrumentation.callApplicationOnCreate(Instrumentation.java:1013) at android.app

express-session secure: true

我的梦境 提交于 2020-07-06 13:45:56
问题 app.use(session({ secret: "testing credentials", store: sessionStore, resave: true, saveUninitialized: true, cookie : { httpOnly: true, //secure: true, maxAge : 60 * 60 * 1000 } })); I'm working on some security problems on my newly developed website. And after done some research online, if secure=true is set, then it will be more secure. However, If set secure: true, then information inside session will lose every time when the user send another request. Is there a way to solve this problem?

express-session secure: true

三世轮回 提交于 2020-07-06 13:44:26
问题 app.use(session({ secret: "testing credentials", store: sessionStore, resave: true, saveUninitialized: true, cookie : { httpOnly: true, //secure: true, maxAge : 60 * 60 * 1000 } })); I'm working on some security problems on my newly developed website. And after done some research online, if secure=true is set, then it will be more secure. However, If set secure: true, then information inside session will lose every time when the user send another request. Is there a way to solve this problem?