roles

I want to make the roles default for my controller class to "Administrators, Content Editors" [Authorize(Roles = "Administrators, Content Editor")] I've done this by adorning the controller with the attribute above. However, there is one action that I want to be available to all (namely "View"). How can I reset the Roles so that everyone (including completely unauthorized users) have access for this action. Note: I know I could adorn every single action other action with the authorize attribute above but I don't want to have to do that all the time. I want all of the controllers actions to be

So, hey guys, I'm creating a Quiz Hosting website just for fun and I'm assigning roles to admin... There is a master admin, who can do/add/edit any and everything.. but I want privileges to other admins to be restricted.. say One can only add/edit questions and categories while other can only handles payments for quizzes..and so on My first question is: Is this a good or rather I should say,the CORRECT thing to do?? My second question: Currently I have achieved this by using numbers 1 to 8 for privileges..the higher the number more the privileges.Is this method OK? is there any room for

Goal: Extend abitrary classes with roles that are only valid in a certain context. This works: # from https://github.com/niccokunzmann/wwp/blob/master/C_builtinTypes.py from relative import roleOf, useRoles @roleOf(int) class NaturalNumber: # int gets successor only in this module @property def successor(self): return 1 + self @roleOf(tuple) @roleOf(list) class MyList: @property def first(self): return self[0] @useRoles def test(): # this is possible if we recompile the code objects i = 1 print(type(i)) assert i.successor == 2 assert i.successor.successor == 3 assert isinstance(i, int) # EDIT3

I have two service providers that I am connecting to Okta in order to manage identities externally. Can you think of a way to configure Okta to accomplish the following: Associate attributes with groups, rather than directly to users. Users within groups would then inherit these attributes. Associate groups with applications, rather than directly associating users with applications. My end goal is to be able to leverage Okta for managing a role store for each service provider. I would expect SAML assertions coming from Okta to be able to be mapped into assertions for individual service

Part A: Role vs RoleGroup Can someone explain the difference between a Role and a RoleGroup in the jboss DatabaseServerLoginModule ? I'm confused after looking at the examples in the JBoss 6 documentation One area of confusion is when they describe the logical tables the user to role mapping table has three columns: Table Principals(PrincipalID text, Password text) Table Roles(PrincipalID text, Role text, RoleGroup text) But the example they offer only uses two columns: CREATE TABLE Users(username VARCHAR(64) PRIMARY KEY, passwd VARCHAR(64)) CREATE TABLE UserRoles(username VARCHAR(64),

I have a SQLite 3 database with 4 columns and QML code with TableView that displays it: TableView { id: table ... TableViewColumn { role: "name" width: 275 } TableViewColumn { role: "surname" width: 300 } TableViewColumn { role: "phone" width: 575 } TableViewColumn { role: "ip_address" width: 525 } model: abonents } It works fine, but I need to display the first two roles, name and surname , as a unique column in TableView . Here is the code for my model and the main . abonentstable.h: #ifndef ABONENTSTABLE #define ABONENTSTABLE #include <QObject> #include <QSqlQueryModel> class

Ironically my role provider does not cache the roles in a cookie anymore. That was working earlier. Unfortunately i have noticed that only now, so i cannot say what causes the problem. But i think it has to do with the update to the new version 1.2 of the universal providers (released on 16th august). My config for the roleprovider looks like: <roleManager enabled="true" cacheRolesInCookie="true" cookieName="X_Roles" cookiePath="/" cookieProtection="All" cookieRequireSSL="true" cookieSlidingExpiration="true" cookieTimeout="1440" createPersistentCookie="false" domain="" maxCachedResults="25"

I am trying to add roles for user but before that i want to check it is exists or not. How Can i do that? Here is my code public void AddRoleForUser(ApplicationUser obj, IdentityRole role) { _userManager = new ApplicationUserManager(new UserStore<ApplicationUser>(_context)); var currentUser = _userManager.FindById(obj.Id); // before this i have to check var roleresult = _userManager.AddToRole(currentUser.Id, role.Name); } for example i have a user and its id =1. When i add role for this user i want to check there is a role for this user before add new role to this user Basanta Matia You just

I have several pages or views in my application which are essentially the same for both authenticated users and anonymous users. I'd like to limit the insert/update/delete actions in formviews and gridviews to authenticated users only, and allow read access for both authed and anon users. I'm using the asp.net configuration system for handling authentication and roles. This system limits access based on path so I've been creating duplicate pages for authed and anon paths. The solution that comes to mind immediately is to check roles in the appropriate event handlers, limiting what possible