reflection

问题 private Methods : I know how to: Run a private void method without parameters Run a private void method with any numbers and Type of parameters Run a private return method without parameters and with any kind of return-Type Run a private return method with any number and Type of parameters and with any kind of return-Type private Fields : I know how to: Set any Type of private field Set any Type of private static field Set any Type of private final field Set any Type of private static final

问题 Disclaimer: I'm doing this for learning purposes. This is not going to be used in code. I'm trying to understand how method table are structure for generics, I want to dynamically appending to methods at runtime. I found a very useful stack overflow question reference for getting me started. I have a simple controller which I'm using as a test to verify my methods are swapping: public class ValuesController : ControllerBase { static ValuesController() { var methodToReplace = typeof

问题 This question already has answers here : How do I use reflection to call a generic method? (7 answers) Closed 5 years ago . I have something like this Type MyType = Type.GetType(FromSomewhereElse); var listS = context.GetList<MyType>().ToList(); I would like to get the Type which is MyType in this case and pass it to the Generic Type method GetList This is the error I am getting: The type or namespace name 'MyType' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference

问题 This question already has answers here : How do I use reflection to call a generic method? (7 answers) Closed 5 years ago . I have something like this Type MyType = Type.GetType(FromSomewhereElse); var listS = context.GetList<MyType>().ToList(); I would like to get the Type which is MyType in this case and pass it to the Generic Type method GetList This is the error I am getting: The type or namespace name 'MyType' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference

问题 I am trying to invoke function of a class using Reflection (assuming that object initialization as no dependency on Function to be invoked) like this /// <summary> /// Calls a static public method. /// Assumes that the method returns a string /// </summary> /// <param name="assemblyName">name of the assembly containing the class in which the method lives.</param> /// <param name="namespaceName">namespace of the class.</param> /// <param name="typeName">name of the class in which the method

问题 I have an example: Assembly asm = Assembly.Load("ClassLibrary1"); Type ob = asm.GetType("ClassLibrary1.UserControl1"); UserControl uc = (UserControl)Activator.CreateInstance(ob); grd.Children.Add(uc); There I'm creating an instance of a class, but how can I create an instance of a class which implements some interface? i.e. UserControl1 implements ILoad interface. U: I can cast object to interface later, but I don't know which type in the assemblies implements the interface. 回答1: This is some

问题 I'd like to know how does .maxstack really work. I know it doesn't have to do with the actual size of the types you are declaring but with the number of them. My questions are: does this apply just for the function, or to all the functions that we are calling for? even if it's just for the function were .maxstack is being declared, how do you know what maxstack is if you have branching? You go and see all the "paths" and return the maximum value possible? What happens if I set it to 16 and

问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 6 months ago . I am curious to learn if .NET supports any form of dynamic interception of method calls (or properties invocations) at runtime. That is, can you intercept a call to an object without static compilation information such as an interface (along the lines of the CORBA DII (link text) or COM's IDispatch). If not,

问题 Suppose we have template <unsigned N> foo() { /* ... */ } defined. Now, I want to implement do_foo(unsigned n); which calls the corresponding variant of foo() . This is not merely a synthetic example - this does actually happen in real life (of course, not necessarily with void-to-void functions and just one template parameter, but I'm simplfying. Of course, in C++, we can't have the following: do_foo(unsigned n) { foo<n>(); } and what I do right now is do_foo(unsigned n) { switch(n) { case n

问题 Suppose we have template <unsigned N> foo() { /* ... */ } defined. Now, I want to implement do_foo(unsigned n); which calls the corresponding variant of foo() . This is not merely a synthetic example - this does actually happen in real life (of course, not necessarily with void-to-void functions and just one template parameter, but I'm simplfying. Of course, in C++, we can't have the following: do_foo(unsigned n) { foo<n>(); } and what I do right now is do_foo(unsigned n) { switch(n) { case n