ramda.js

Grouping and summing in Ramda.js

百般思念 提交于 2021-02-19 04:13:41
问题 I've got two lists: var listA = [ { Id: 2, Date: "2014-11-28", Amount: 30 }, { Id: 1, Date: "2014-11-27", Amount: 15 }, { Id: 1, Date: "2014-11-28", Amount: 20 }, ]; var listB = [ { Id: 1, Date: "2014-11-27", Amount: 15 }, { Id: 2, Date: "2014-11-26", Amount: 25 }, ]; I want to combine the data from both lists, grouping them by Id and using the highest date for each Id in the result, and summing the totals of the unique objects (ie. objects with the same Id and Date - there can only be one

Ramda pipe with multiple arguments

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2021-02-10 05:43:10
问题 I have a method which requires multiple arguments, and I am trying to set up a ramda pipe to handle it. Here's an example: const R = require('ramda'); const input = [ { data: { number: 'v01', attached: [ 't01' ] } }, { data: { number: 'v02', attached: [ 't02' ] } }, { data: { number: 'v03', attached: [ 't03' ] } }, ] const method = R.curry((number, array) => { return R.pipe( R.pluck('data'), R.find(x => x.number === number), R.prop('attached'), R.head )(array) }) method('v02', input) Is there

Is there a Variadic Version of either (R.either)?

最后都变了- 提交于 2021-02-07 15:17:15
问题 I have a need for a variadic version of R.either . After doing some searching around the web, I have not found a solution. R.anyPass would work but it returns a Boolean instead of the original value. Is there already a solution that I have overlooked? If not, what would be the most optimal way to write a variadic either utility function? An example: const test = variadicEither(R.multiply(0), R.add(-1), R.add(1), R.add(2)) test(1) // => 2 回答1: You could use a combination of reduce + reduced :

Is there a Variadic Version of either (R.either)?

匆匆过客 提交于 2021-02-07 15:11:40
问题 I have a need for a variadic version of R.either . After doing some searching around the web, I have not found a solution. R.anyPass would work but it returns a Boolean instead of the original value. Is there already a solution that I have overlooked? If not, what would be the most optimal way to write a variadic either utility function? An example: const test = variadicEither(R.multiply(0), R.add(-1), R.add(1), R.add(2)) test(1) // => 2 回答1: You could use a combination of reduce + reduced :

Is there a Variadic Version of either (R.either)?

走远了吗. 提交于 2021-02-07 15:10:16
问题 I have a need for a variadic version of R.either . After doing some searching around the web, I have not found a solution. R.anyPass would work but it returns a Boolean instead of the original value. Is there already a solution that I have overlooked? If not, what would be the most optimal way to write a variadic either utility function? An example: const test = variadicEither(R.multiply(0), R.add(-1), R.add(1), R.add(2)) test(1) // => 2 回答1: You could use a combination of reduce + reduced :

Is there a Variadic Version of either (R.either)?

五迷三道 提交于 2021-02-07 15:09:58
问题 I have a need for a variadic version of R.either . After doing some searching around the web, I have not found a solution. R.anyPass would work but it returns a Boolean instead of the original value. Is there already a solution that I have overlooked? If not, what would be the most optimal way to write a variadic either utility function? An example: const test = variadicEither(R.multiply(0), R.add(-1), R.add(1), R.add(2)) test(1) // => 2 回答1: You could use a combination of reduce + reduced :

Transducer flatten and uniq

£可爱£侵袭症+ 提交于 2021-02-04 20:58:49
问题 I'm wondering if there is a way by using a transducer for flattening a list and filter on unique values? By chaining, it is very easy: import {uniq, flattenDeep} from 'lodash';| const arr = [1, 2, [2, 3], [1, [4, 5]]]; uniq(flattendDeep(arr)); // -> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.core.min.js"></script> But here we loop twice over the list (+ n by depth layer). Not ideal. What I'm trying to achieve is to use a transducer for this

Transducer flatten and uniq

戏子无情 提交于 2021-02-04 20:58:26
问题 I'm wondering if there is a way by using a transducer for flattening a list and filter on unique values? By chaining, it is very easy: import {uniq, flattenDeep} from 'lodash';| const arr = [1, 2, [2, 3], [1, [4, 5]]]; uniq(flattendDeep(arr)); // -> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.core.min.js"></script> But here we loop twice over the list (+ n by depth layer). Not ideal. What I'm trying to achieve is to use a transducer for this

Transducer flatten and uniq

妖精的绣舞 提交于 2021-02-04 20:58:16
问题 I'm wondering if there is a way by using a transducer for flattening a list and filter on unique values? By chaining, it is very easy: import {uniq, flattenDeep} from 'lodash';| const arr = [1, 2, [2, 3], [1, [4, 5]]]; uniq(flattendDeep(arr)); // -> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.10/lodash.core.min.js"></script> But here we loop twice over the list (+ n by depth layer). Not ideal. What I'm trying to achieve is to use a transducer for this

Sort doubly linked list by next id Ramda.js

五迷三道 提交于 2021-01-29 20:35:17
问题 I want to sort doubly linked list by next_id value. My DLL: const dll = [ {id: '22', prev_id: '41', next_id: '45'}, {id: '45', prev_id: '22', next_id: null}, {id: '41', prev_id: '14', next_id: '22'}, {id: '14', prev_id: null, next_id: '41'}, ] As a result: const dll_result = [ {id: '14', prev_id: null, next_id: '41'}, // next item - 41 {id: '41', prev_id: '14', next_id: '22'}, // next item - 22 {id: '22', prev_id: '41', next_id: '45'}, // next item - 45 {id: '45', prev_id: '22', next_id: null