queue

What's the most elegant way to implement a digest email without reinventing a queueing system?

拈花ヽ惹草 提交于 2019-12-20 14:17:05
问题 I have my transactional email system setup & by default people get emails as events happen: class Comment after_create :email_original_poster def email_original_poster UserMailer.delay.notify_author_of_comment self end end However instead of getting the email as-it-happens, a chunk of my users would prefer a daily or weekly digest. What's the cleanest most elegant way to implement this? I've already got delayed_job running but this doesn't really feel like a delayed_job job since I'm queueing

What's the most elegant way to implement a digest email without reinventing a queueing system?

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-12-20 14:16:28
问题 I have my transactional email system setup & by default people get emails as events happen: class Comment after_create :email_original_poster def email_original_poster UserMailer.delay.notify_author_of_comment self end end However instead of getting the email as-it-happens, a chunk of my users would prefer a daily or weekly digest. What's the cleanest most elegant way to implement this? I've already got delayed_job running but this doesn't really feel like a delayed_job job since I'm queueing

Python Multiprocessing using Queue to write to same file

会有一股神秘感。 提交于 2019-12-20 13:53:13
问题 I know there are many post on Stack Exchange related to writing results from multiprocessing to single file and I have developed my code after reading only those posts. What I am trying to achieve is that run 'RevMapCoord' function in parallel and write its result in one single file using multiprocess.queue. But I am having problem while queuing my job. My Code: def RevMapCoord(list): "Read a file, Find String and Do something" def feed(queue, parlist): for par in parlist: print ('Echo from

Python multiprocessing Queue failure

余生颓废 提交于 2019-12-20 12:41:11
问题 I create 100 child processes proc_list = [ Process(target = simulator, args=(result_queue,)) for i in xrange(100)] and start them for proc in proc_list: proc.start() Each process puts into the result_queue (instance of multiprocessing.Queue) 10000 tuples after doing some processing. def simulate(alg_instance, image_ids, gamma, results, simulations, sim_semaphore): (rs, qs, t_us) = alg_instance.simulate_multiple(image_ids, gamma, simulations) all_tuples = zip(rs, qs, t_us) for result in all

PHP + MySQL Queue

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-12-20 10:56:06
问题 I need a simple table that acts as a Queue. My MySQL server restriction is I can't use InnoDB tables, only MyISAM. Clients/workers will work at the same time and they will need to receive differents jobs each time. My idea is to do the following (pseudo-code): $job <- SELECT * FROM queue ORDER BY last_pop ASC LIMIT 1; UPDATE queue SET last_pop WHERE id = $job->id return $job I had tried table lock and "GET_LOCK" but nothing happends, workers sometimes receives same jobs. 回答1: You need to turn

Implementing a simple queue using arrays

大兔子大兔子 提交于 2019-12-20 10:49:11
问题 I don't know much about arrays and queues and stacks. I know how to implement a simple queue. #include <iostream> #include <queue> using namespace std; void main() { queue<char> queue1; queue1.push('a'); queue1.push('b'); queue1.push('c'); queue1.push('d'); while(!queue1.empty()) { cout << queue1.front(); queue1.pop(); cout << endl; } system("pause"); } How can I implement a simple queue using an array? 回答1: If your queue is based on an array, then for efficiency's sake, I would recommend

Is there a better way to wait for queued threads?

守給你的承諾、 提交于 2019-12-20 09:17:37
问题 Is there a better way to wait for queued threads before execute another process? Currently I'm doing: this.workerLocker = new object(); // Global variable this.RunningWorkers = arrayStrings.Length; // Global variable // Initiate process foreach (string someString in arrayStrings) { ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(this.DoSomething, someString); Thread.Sleep(100); } // Waiting execution for all queued threads lock (this.workerLocker) // Global variable (object) { while (this.RunningWorkers > 0) {

List vs Queue vs Set of collections in Java

假装没事ソ 提交于 2019-12-20 08:41:01
问题 what is the difference among list, queue and set? 回答1: In brief: A list is an ordered list of objects, where the same object may well appear more than once. For example: [1, 7, 1, 3, 1, 1, 1, 5]. It makes sense to talk about the "third element" in a list. You can add an element anywhere in the list, change an element anywhere in the list, or remove an element from any position in the list. A queue is also ordered, but you'll only ever touch elements at one end. All elements get inserted at

Scalability issue when using outgoing asynchronous web requests on IIS 7.5

好久不见. 提交于 2019-12-20 08:11:12
问题 A bit of a long description below, but it is a quite tricky problem. I have tried to cover what we do know about the problem in order to narrow down the search. The question is more of an ongoing investigation than a single-question based one but I think it may help others as well. But please add information in comments or correct me if you think I am wrong about some assumptions below. UPDATE 19/2, 2013: We have cleared some question marks in this and I have a theory of what the main problem

How do I implement my own advanced Producer/Consumer scenario?

断了今生、忘了曾经 提交于 2019-12-20 05:12:29
问题 NOTE: i did a complete rework of my question. you can see the original question via the change-history. i'm in the need of a "mighty" queue, which provides following functionalities: i have a certain scope for a group of objects. that means that Group A , Group B , ... will have their own queue i'm filling a queue in a group-scoped thread Thread A (Producer) i'm reading a queue in a group-scoped thread Thread B (Consumer) so i will have following scenarios: there is and will be no item in the