push

To git@github.com:xxx/xxxxx.git ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast-forward) error: failed to push some refs to 'git@github.com:xxx/xxxxx.git' To prevent you from losing history, non-fast-forward updates were rejected Merge the remote changes before pushing again. See the 'Note about fast-forwards' section of 'git push --help' for details. I got this error when I tried to push some changes. When I try to fetch from repo i get From github.com:xxx/xxxxx * branch master -> FETCH_HEAD What should I do to solve this ? It's been basically just me on the repo so far, I've had just two pushes from

I've been experiencing this very odd problem lately in Heroku. I develop and test locally, then I push the changes to Heroku. Even though the files pushed have been changed (and Heroku does recognize it and push the new files), when I look at the exact webpage on Heroku, it behaves as though it was still using the old version of the file that I just pushed. When I see the HTML source in firebug, I can actually confirm that the old file is being used. I've tried using git push -f to "force" the git push, but no luck any ideas?? Try heroku restart to force a restart of all the dynos. I'm not

How can I hinder mercurial from putting changesets to phase “public” on push operations? I want them to stay “draft”. I rebase and histedit a lot, and the repository I push to is for me only. And having to change the phase all the time is a nuisance. What the documentation does not clearly reveal is: The phase-change on push is not a purely local decision. – After “uploading” the changesets, the client asks the server for updates regarding the phases of the commits, and the server is usually telling that they are now “public”. Thus, the .hgrc -snippet [phases] publish = False has to be put on

I've read a little about comet and also APE. Which one is better? I want the users to see other users updated content. Like Google Wave. And in comet, there are 2 versions: iframe vs traditional ajax. what is the difference and which is better. I dont quite understand it. Thanks. Comet is a set of techniques useful for developing realtime applications. You have two main implementations: streaming and long polling. In regular http requests the user sends the request to the server, receives the data (html, scrips, etc) and closes the connection - end of story. In streaming the connection is

Should ALL locally created GIT branches be pushed to the central-repository on a daily basis? What is best-pracice workflow concerning this? We created a GIT repository to manage our large e-commerce site, which is under continual development by a large team. The central repository is at 'Beanstalk' and we have three primary branches, 'prestaging' (master), 'staging' and 'production'. All development should be merged into prestaging when it is completed locally and ready to be published. I can see pushing long-running branches to Beanstalk as well. However some of our team advocates pushing

When would the Fetch URL and Push URL not be the same for a certain remote? For example, when i run git remote show central for a remote named central, the output looks like: * remote central Fetch URL: aoberoi@example.com:/home/aoberoi/Repositories/example.git Push URL: aoberoi@example.com:/home/aoberoi/Repositories/example.git HEAD branch: master Remote branch: master tracked I just don't see why I would be fetching from and pushing to two different URLs, what type of workflow is this intended for? VonC I am not sure what you mean, since your example includes 2 identical URL, but URLS for