push

I am working on some bugs in our code base and I have created separate branches for each bug. I have rebased one of the branches on top of default. I generally use the mercurial plugin for Eclipse and I would do a push (when I am in the default branch). This pushes my changes on the default branch. I tried to do the same thing with TortoiseHg. When I press push, the client complains that I am about to create remote heads/create new branches on the server. Is there some way to push only changes on one branch using TortoiseHg? Thanks for your answers! Tim Henigan The easiest way to do this is

I am just starting to look at JQuery; until now everything has been PHP. Just curious: if the server detects an event and wants to update the user's browser, can I do server push, or does the client have to poll? Client has to poll, but you can do long polling , i.e. keep the request alive until the server has an event to push back (i.e. complete request). Otherwise, you can use Web Sockets. The HTTP protocol works on the request-response principle which means that the server can only generate a response following a request from the client. This means that the server cannot send a response to

I have updated the All Project access permission yesterday, people says that they cannot push changes to repository this morning. After I recovered the access permission, they still cannot push changes to repository, only clone works fine. While push changes to remote repository, it says that: ![remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master (prohibited by Gerrit) All our other projects are inherit from All project 's access permission, I updated the access permission to the lowest level (i.e. Anonymous can push branch to refs/heads/* ) for test, but I find that the Administrator cannot push changes

I created local hg repository for new project: hg init ; hg addremove , then I created empty upstream repo, and pushed first version there: hg push https://remoterepo . Now, I want to set that https://remoterepo as default upstream, so I can just do hg push/pull without giving it. I was surprised Google did not give me a straight answer with "set mercurial upstream", and I didn't find a direct answer here at SO either. So, for the benefit of all the people using SO as a howto, what's the right way to do this? You can do that by adding the upstream URL to /project/.hg/hgrc like this: [paths]

I am developing an android app that is connected to a Mysql database through a php webservice. Right now I can read the data from the Mysql database and add them to my android sqlite database just fine. Now I need to push any updates to the data from the database to the app. After looking into this a lot the best solution that is suggested is GCM however due to some restrictions in the project I am not allowed to use it. Can anyone suggest any alternatives keeping in mind that I am fairly new at all of this. Thanks. AsyncTask is an abstract class provided by Android which helps us to use the

开发移动App 的童鞋，都会有这样一个问题：应用发出去了，就不可控了。用户手机上一堆的应用，有可能用户根本就忘记了我这个应用的存在，不怎么去使用，我有没有什么办法？我发布了新版本相信可以更吸引用户，但他也不知道啊；我想做个活动来激活用户更多地使用我的应用，怎么做到呢？ 提高活跃度的根本当然还在于产品本身，这一点是毋庸置疑的。正如有牛人总结说： 互联网企业产品是唯一的核心 。 想必很多人了解，产品之外，运营也是非常重要的部分，甚至是更重要的部分。最近著名的移动应用统计供应商 Flurry 发表了一篇文章： 移动应用经济的数学模型 － 盈利模式矩阵 。这篇文明开篇就谈到：在新的移动应用经济中，不管一个公司最初有多成功， 最后的胜者取决于用户参与度和维系用户的能力。获得用户之后，真正的战斗才刚打响，那就是留住用户，并通过他们最终获利。 在“移动优先”的全新世界里，参与度就是新战场。 而在移动App里集成 Push能力，则赋予了开发者对移动App的运营能力，让开发者有更多的机会来与用户交互，让用户更多地参与进来，留住用户，并最终提高获利。 Push 怎么样提高应用的活跃度 国外为很多大 IT 公司包括 Oracle, Intel, Saleforce, USA Today 在内都使用的第三方推送服务 Urban Airship ，针对大量应用做了一个统计，如下图： 上图表明

We had no problem sending notifications to provisioned devices using the development certification and gateway.sandbox.push.apple.com. But now now that our app is in the store, it appears we can't even connect to the production apn server (gateway.push.apple.com) to send pushes, even when we're using the machines that created the certificates in the first place. We've run this through PushMeBaby and it looks like the connection to gateway.push.apple.com is getting refused. When it executes the handshake ( SSLHandshake(context) ) the result is error code -9044, or errSSLConnectionRefused - The

In push notification mechanisms, like Apple's Push Notification Service, they use persistent IP connections. My question is, how does employing persistent connections save battery and bandwidth of a device? I am under the impression that since the connection is persistent, then the device always uses the WiFi or 3G/LTE radio. I know that through persistent connections, you will not waste bandwidth by not asking the server for changes when there is none, and instead the server will "push" to you these changes. But, I don't see how that preserves battery and bandwidth (since you have an always

Does someone now a good npm module to implement Apple PUSH notifications? A simple example would be great. The solution I've found is the following which uses the apn module. var apn = require('apn'); var ca = ['entrust_2048_ca.cer']; /* Connection Options */ var options = { cert: 'path to yuour cert.pem', key: 'path to your key.pem', ca: ca, passphrase: 'your passphrase', production: true, connectionTimeout: 10000 }; var apnConnection = new apn.Connection(options); /* Device */ var deviceToken = 'your device token'; var myDevice = new apn.Device(deviceToken); /* Notification */ var note = new