pseudo-class

Here I have some CSS: #image-edges-beneath:hover{ background-color: blue; } #image-edges:hover{ background-color: blue; } #image-edges-beneat:hover:after{ -webkit-transition: all 1s ease; -moz-transition: all 1s ease; -o-transition: all 1s ease; -ms-transition: all 1s ease; transition: all 1s ease; border: 2px solid #F1FD6D; } #image-edges:hover:after{ -webkit-transition: all 1s ease; -moz-transition: all 1s ease; -o-transition: all 1s ease; -ms-transition: all 1s ease; transition: all 1s ease; border: 2px solid #F1FD6D; } However this does not work. The only thing which happens is that the

I am sending some mail from my php script. it has structure like: <style type="text/css"> .elements{ /*its CSS*/ } .elements:hover{ /* Hoverd CSS changes background and color*/ } </style> <center> Actual Mail Body <a class="elements" href="URL">Element</a> <center> and this works fine in all mail clients except gmail . So a quick SO search lead me to: HTML formatted email not showing up at all in Gmail but is in other mail clients and I came to know that gmail doesn't support <style> but supports inline-style . So I tried this: <center> Actual Mail Body <a class="elements" href="URL" style="it

I am struggling with a reluctant a:hover css style which I cannot override. I tried to inspect the element in Firebug, but I cannot see why it won't work. I don't even see how to properly inspect a:hover css event in Firebug. I have seen: Hover Inspection in Firebug http://blog.borngeek.com/2010/04/16/hover-inspection-in-firebug/ but I have not figured out how to reproduce the steps mentioned there. Also: Pseudo-Phantoms http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2009/11/03/pseudo-phantoms/ How do I inspect/debug CSS pseudo classes like :hover with Firebug? It's pretty easy. Just select the element you

I am using some thing like this in css input[type=radio]:checked + label { color:#121212 } the problem is this the checked property is not working in Internet-Explorer-8 and 7. ifI use like this input[type=radio] + label { color:$888888 } its working properly Please tell me alternate of this You can use http://selectivizr.com/ JS. It's support css3 selector in older version of IE. The pseudo-class :checked is not supported in IE 7. http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/pseudoclass-checked That is a pseudo-class. pseudo-class is currently not supported in Internet Explorer. 来源： https:/

I am making a page with a CSS lightbox-type effect using the :target pseudo-class. When you click on an image, a box pops up with info in it, and goes away again when you click anywhere. It's working perfectly in Chrome and IE, but in firefox there is a weird bug where the text in my lightbox div disappears when you move the mouse away from the box . It's acting like a hover effect, where you can only see the text when you are hovering over it. I hope that explanation made sense, please let me know if I was not clear. My CSS is here: .lightbox { display: none; position: absolute; z-index: 8;

Possible Duplicate: CSS 3 content selector? I was wondering, is it possible to select an element based on its content with CSS? I realize I can use something like this: .this[href="./foo.php"] { /* And the styles... */ } But is there a way to select based on inner content? So if I have this: <p>[ Continued ]</p> How can I select it based on it's content, [ Continued ] , if I can? No, not with CSS, and there really should never be a need too. If you're making a "Continued" button, link, or whatever: specify a class, maybe an ID, or even use an attribute, and select it. There really is no need

Upon the realization that you can't have an inline pseudoclass -- How to write a:hover in inline CSS? -- I looked into having Javascript do the same job with the onMouseOver and onMouseOut events to simulate the :hover pseudoclass. I'm trying to remove the underline from the text when the mouse is above it. Is there a snippet of Javascript someone can offer that can do that? I tried onMouseOver="this.style.textDecoration="none"" , but I think the contrasting quotations are throwing everything off. Any ideas? Note: unfortunately, this effect must be achieved without the use of an external or