I am sending some mail from my php
script.
it has structure like:
<style type="text/css">
.elements{
/*its CSS*/
}
.elements:hover{
/* Hoverd CSS changes background and color*/
}
</style>
<center>
Actual Mail Body <a class="elements" href="URL">Element</a>
<center>
and this works fine in all mail clients except gmail
.
So a quick SO
search lead me to: HTML formatted email not showing up at all in Gmail but is in other mail clients
and I came to know that gmail
doesn't support <style>
but supports inline-style
.
So I tried this:
<center>
Actual Mail Body <a class="elements" href="URL" style="it's style here">Element</a>
<center>
But now my problem is :hover
pseudoclass can't be converted to inline-style
, So I tried to mimic it with JavaScript
as:
<center>
Actual Mail Body <a class="elements" href="URL"
OnMouseOver="this.style.background='#ddeeff';this.style['color']='#555555';"
onmouseout="back-to-original-css">Element</a>
<center>
But that ain't helped me.
So is there any way to make :hover
pseudo class work in gmail
mail client?
Also I don't think this is impossible (have a look at g+'s
mail in your gmail
account. They can send such mails.)
Any thoughts, ideas, suggestion are welcome, thanks in advance.
Well there are a lot of controversy on the subject but, here is what I found. Prepare for a wall of text. It appears you can use a workaround to make <style>
work, as stated here.
Here are the actual quotes:
Gmail strips class and id attributes from all elements but leaves some other attributes intact: style, title, lang, width, height, alt, href.
Since href and alt are not technically legal attributes for divs I decided not to use them even though you could if you wanted to. A prime candidate would be title – however title comes with one side-effect – when the user hovers the cursor over the element, the title would be visible.
I chose the lang attribute because it is a universal attribute (valid for all elements) that is not visible when hovered over. Naturally we’re not using this attribute for its intended purpose – but there’s a technical exception in the HTML specifications that allow us to use it this way. By pre-pending the attribute value with an “x-”, this signifies that the lang attribute is not meant to be meaningful to the client and as far as I know, no email client currently processes the lang attribute anyways.
Breakdown
Here’s a total breakdown of all the styles I’ve tried and found working in Gmail:
The following works in Gmail: * E[foo] * E[foo="bar"] * E[foo~="bar"] * E[foo^="bar"] * E[foo*="bar"] * E[foo$="bar"] * E:hover * E:link * E:visited * E:active E F E > F E + F E ~ F
Summary of how Gmail processes CSS in a style tag (in the of the email).
.divbox {..} //Allowed but pointless - Gmail strips class attributes from elements
#divbox {..} //Allowed but pointless - Gmail strips id attributes from elements
[class~="divbox"] {...} //Removed by Gmail
* [class~="divbox"] {...} //Allowed but pointless - No class attributes
div {...} //Allowed but too generic to be useful
div:hover {...} //Removed by gmail. No pseudo class support? Not so fast!
* div:hover {...} //Allowed! Interesting…
* [lang~="x-divbox"] {...} //Allowed! Now we’re talking
* [lang~="x-divbox"]:hover {...} //Allowed! Magic! :)
Disclaimer: The article is not written by me, and I take no credit for it.
EDIT:
I tested it it works on both gmail and outlook (hotmail).
The code I used:
<html>
<head>
<style>
* [title="divbox"]:hover{
background-color: green !important;
color: white;
}
.blinking:hover{
background-color: green !important;
color: white;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="blinking" title="divbox" style="padding:10px;width:100px;height:40px;
background-color:#eeeeee;">Divbox Content</div>
</body>
</html>
PS: The blinking
class is for hotmail, since it doesn't display the gmail workaround.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25812613/hover-pseudoclass-selector-in-email-for-gmail