policies

问题 I'm using Windows Server 2012, and I want to disable the cmd and the PowerShell for the clients. I've searched in the Group Policies but i didn't find where I can do this. Please can somebody help me? 回答1: Disable access to powershell: In the Group Policy window for those users, on the left-hand side, scroll down to User Configuration > Administrative Templates > System > Don’t run specified Windows applications. In the properties window that opens, click the “Enabled” option and then click

问题 I'm using Windows Server 2012, and I want to disable the cmd and the PowerShell for the clients. I've searched in the Group Policies but i didn't find where I can do this. Please can somebody help me? 回答1: Disable access to powershell: In the Group Policy window for those users, on the left-hand side, scroll down to User Configuration > Administrative Templates > System > Don’t run specified Windows applications. In the properties window that opens, click the “Enabled” option and then click

问题 I'm pretty new with Rails and I have a problem with the following policies (using Pundit): I'd like to compare two objects: @record and @foo , as you can see here: class BarPolicy < ApplicationPolicy def show? @record.foo_id == @foo end end I don't reach to find a good way to pass a second parameter to pundit methods (@foo). I'd like to do something like: class BarsController < ApplicationController def test authorize bar, @foo, :show? # Throws ArgumentError ... end end But the Pundit

问题 I'm pretty new with Rails and I have a problem with the following policies (using Pundit): I'd like to compare two objects: @record and @foo , as you can see here: class BarPolicy < ApplicationPolicy def show? @record.foo_id == @foo end end I don't reach to find a good way to pass a second parameter to pundit methods (@foo). I'd like to do something like: class BarsController < ApplicationController def test authorize bar, @foo, :show? # Throws ArgumentError ... end end But the Pundit

问题 I'm pretty new with Rails and I have a problem with the following policies (using Pundit): I'd like to compare two objects: @record and @foo , as you can see here: class BarPolicy < ApplicationPolicy def show? @record.foo_id == @foo end end I don't reach to find a good way to pass a second parameter to pundit methods (@foo). I'd like to do something like: class BarsController < ApplicationController def test authorize bar, @foo, :show? # Throws ArgumentError ... end end But the Pundit

问题 I followed this article where it explains how to implement a custom policy using Active Directory B2C. Everything is working great, the only concern I have is that the custom claim is returned like a serialized object. Let me explain a little bit better. I successfully created the Azure Function which return the custom claim. The encoded resulting JWT is like the following (please focus on the " userPermissions " value): { "exp": 1594560277, "nbf": 1594556677, "ver": "1.0", "auth_time":

问题 Is there a way to enforce tagging while creating EC2-Instances? I,e user cannot launch an instance without certain tags. And can I use that tags to give control to particular instance depending on the tag? 回答1: Yes, you have to use the "ec2:CreateAction" condition to limit the tag creating while creating the resource (instance/volume) and "aws:RequestTag" condition to control which tag key-value is required to create the resource. There are example policies here and for more information,

问题 NOTE: SEE MY OWN ANSWER BELOW I have been looking through the slim documentation for hours. What I need is this: I have an incoming GET request from a system that can ONLY send GET requests. My back-end service requires a POST request. Can someone point me in the right direction in regards to what APIM policy I should be using or a combination of policies. I am using the policy reference but still can't come up with a decent solution: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn894081

问题 I've been reading quite a lot of questions on Stackoverflow about this question but couldn't quit find a solution or answer for my problem. If there is already one I would be grateful if somebody would give a hint ... My problem/question is if it is possible to completely disable reflection for not trustworthy code? Functions like getDeclaredMethods() (See test.java). I've already got a Java Security Manager which throws Security Exceptions if the code tries to write/read/etc. ... If it is

问题 I read here : https://laravel.com/docs/5.3/authorization#writing-policies And I tried to like this My FavoritePolicy is like this : <?php namespace App\Policies; use App\User; use App\Models\Favorite; use Illuminate\Auth\Access\HandlesAuthorization; class FavoritePolicy { use HandlesAuthorization; public function view(User $user, Favorite $favorite) { return $user->id === $favorite->user_id; } } My FavoriteController is like this : <?php use App\Models\Favorite; ... class FavoriteController