platform

问题 We can access Go's package documentation online on the official website: https://golang.org/pkg/ This only contains the package documentation available on the linux platform ( GOOS ), amd64 archicture ( GOARCH ). Or offline via the go doc command, e.g package doc of the syscall package. go doc syscall This shows documentation for the platform of the Go SDK. Some packages have different API based on the platform we target, most famous is the syscall package. How can we access platform specific

问题 I was just curious if there is a way to get platform.pk8 and platform.x509.pem which are used to sign the rom inside the Android device. My aim is no more than developing system applications for testing and using my self-owned devices on my desired purpose. For those who are not familiar with creating system apks: signing an apk with system signature [WITHOUT ROOTING] 回答1: No. At least, not if the person building the ROM knows what they're doing. From the docs (emphasis mine): Each key comes

问题 I was just curious if there is a way to get platform.pk8 and platform.x509.pem which are used to sign the rom inside the Android device. My aim is no more than developing system applications for testing and using my self-owned devices on my desired purpose. For those who are not familiar with creating system apks: signing an apk with system signature [WITHOUT ROOTING] 回答1: No. At least, not if the person building the ROM knows what they're doing. From the docs (emphasis mine): Each key comes

问题 Due to user confusion, our app requires separate installers for 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows. While the 32-bit installer runs fine on win64, it has the potential to create support headaches and we would like to prevent this from happening. I want to prevent the 32-bit MSI installer from running on 64-bit Windows machines. To that end I have the following condition: <Condition Message="You are attempting to run the 32-bit installer on a 64-bit version of Windows."> <![CDATA[Msix64 AND

问题 Due to user confusion, our app requires separate installers for 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows. While the 32-bit installer runs fine on win64, it has the potential to create support headaches and we would like to prevent this from happening. I want to prevent the 32-bit MSI installer from running on 64-bit Windows machines. To that end I have the following condition: <Condition Message="You are attempting to run the 32-bit installer on a 64-bit version of Windows."> <![CDATA[Msix64 AND

问题 I am writing a native plugin that, in some cases, has to call functions in the Flutter portion of the app, written in Dart. How it's achieved, is explained here: https://flutter.io/platform-channels/ Furthermore, an example of invoking a method from the native/platform part towards the Dart/non-native is here: https://github.com/flutter/plugins/tree/master/packages/quick_actions Now, this example is really nice in case the platform only needs to invoke a method , i.e. that call returns

问题 I'm installing the Sharp package for image compression on the docker image for a Nodejs project with package.json. When I create the container I get the following error regarding to the sharp package: /app/node_modules/sharp/lib/libvips.js:67 throw new Error(`'${vendorPlatformId}' binaries cannot be used on the '${currentPlatformId}' platform. Please remove the 'node_modules/sharp/vendor' directory and run 'npm install'.`); ^ Error: 'linux-x64' binaries cannot be used on the 'linuxmusl-x64'

问题 When creating a new LocalDateTime using LocalDateTime.now() on my Mac and Windows machine i get a nano precision of 6 on my Mac and a nano precision of 3 on my Windows machine. Both are running jdk-1.8.0-172 . Is it possible to limit or increase the precision on one of the machines? And why is the precision actually different? 回答1: The precision is different because LocalDateTime.now() uses a system default Clock. Obtains the current date-time from the system clock in the default time-zone.

问题 When creating a new LocalDateTime using LocalDateTime.now() on my Mac and Windows machine i get a nano precision of 6 on my Mac and a nano precision of 3 on my Windows machine. Both are running jdk-1.8.0-172 . Is it possible to limit or increase the precision on one of the machines? And why is the precision actually different? 回答1: The precision is different because LocalDateTime.now() uses a system default Clock. Obtains the current date-time from the system clock in the default time-zone.

问题 When creating a new LocalDateTime using LocalDateTime.now() on my Mac and Windows machine i get a nano precision of 6 on my Mac and a nano precision of 3 on my Windows machine. Both are running jdk-1.8.0-172 . Is it possible to limit or increase the precision on one of the machines? And why is the precision actually different? 回答1: The precision is different because LocalDateTime.now() uses a system default Clock. Obtains the current date-time from the system clock in the default time-zone.