overriding

How to override template “folder_full_view_item.pt” only for a Custom Type?

試著忘記壹切 提交于 2019-12-05 19:26:24
This question has evolved in a confusing way. Some of its parts though, and specially some answers, might be useful for someone. Therefore I'll let this question unmodified and I'll try to reformulate the question here . Overriding the template folder_full_view_item.pt with z3c.jbot will override the template for all Content Types. How do I override it only for a single Content Type MyType in a Product with many types? Having the following structure: Folder (layout=folder_full_view) Document (layout=document_view) MyType (layout=mytype_view) The default steps in Plone are: The template folder

Is it possible to override a native method in a Java class in Android/dalvik?

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-12-05 19:05:27
问题 I am unit testing a class TestMe using EasyMock, and one of its methods (say method(N n) ) expects a parameter of type N which has a native method (say nativeMethod() ). class TestMe { void method(N n) { // Do stuff n.nativeMethod(); // Do more stuff } } method() needs to invoke N.nativeMethod() at some point, and the problem I'm having is that my Easymock mock object for N is unable to override the native method. I do not own class N but I can refactor TestMe in any way necessary. I decided

Override equals() method only of a Java object

只谈情不闲聊 提交于 2019-12-05 19:00:00
I am developing an Android application which makes use of the ScanResult object. This object is in the form of: [SSID: __mynetwork__, BSSID: 00:0e:2e:ae:4e:85, capabilities: [WPA-PSK-TKIP][ESS], level: -69, frequency: 2457, timestamp: 117455824743] How would I override only the equals() method without creating a customer class which extends it in order to compare only the SSID , BSSID , capabilties , level and frequency attributes only? In other words, in the equals method I want to eliminate the timestamp attribute, so that when I compare these two objects, the equals() method would return a

Method has the same erasure as another method in type - part 2

你说的曾经没有我的故事 提交于 2019-12-05 18:57:51
I completely get this question Method has the same erasure as another method in type and the answer to it. Please can anyone help me understand the below? Trying hard to digest, why the 2nd code snippet below gives compiler error? Code 1: Compiles fine class Parent { public void set(Collection<Integer> c) { } } class Child extends Parent { public void set(Collection<Integer> c) {} } Code 2: Compiler Error at set method in Child class. class Parent { public void set(Collection<?> c) { } } class Child extends Parent { public void set(Collection<Integer> c) {} } Compiler Error is Name clash: The

Use reflection to find all public virtual methods and provide an override

我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2019-12-05 18:26:29
I have a project where I want to be able to iterate across an instance of a class and find all methods that are marked public virtual. Then I want to override the instance of the class so that when the method is called I can call a different set of code. I know how to find all methods that are public in a class using reflection, but I cannot figure out how to override virtual methods. Basically I am giving a proxy object to use, and when they call the method, I want to call a method on the underlying object. I can do this by manually overriding each and every method, but I would like to use

How to override default maven-install-plugin behavior?

懵懂的女人 提交于 2019-12-05 18:19:35
I'm need of custom artifact installation and can't figure how to override the default one (from default maven lifecycle). So my question is: How to configure maven install plugin in my pom.xml so it doesn't do default install and executes just my custom install-file goals? I tried without id and with default-install id and it didn't help. Update: From the provided answer - this does not work for me (I see two install attempts in log). <pluginManagement> <plugins> <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-install-plugin</artifactId> <executions> <execution> <id

Why doesn't my function skip trying to resolve to the incompatible template function, and default to resolving to the regular function? [duplicate]

删除回忆录丶 提交于 2019-12-05 18:15:37
This question already has an answer here: Why can't a template function resolve a pointer to a derived class to be a pointer to a base class 1 answer std::string nonSpecStr = "non specialized func"; std::string const nonTemplateStr = "non template func"; class Base {}; class Derived : public Base {}; template <typename T> std::string func(T * i_obj) { ( * i_obj) += 1; return nonSpecStr; } std::string func(Base * i_obj) { return nonTemplateStr; } void run() { // Function resolution order // 1. non-template functions // 2. specialized template functions // 3. template functions Base * base = new

Overriding jQuery plugin methods, as default and for single instances

左心房为你撑大大i 提交于 2019-12-05 17:56:11
The basic question is: How do I perform a basic override of a plugin method without editing the original plugin file? Is it possible to create an override for a specific instance: Example: An rtf plugin uses: $('selector').wysiwyg('setContent',newContent); In order to display the rtf text as readonly I would like for the same method to be applied to a div instead of the body of the IFRAME I would like to overwrite the original 'setContent' with my own code, just for this one element. Thanks jAndy (function($){ var _oldcss = $.fn.css; $.fn.css = function(prop,value){ if (value.toLowerCase() ===

Overriding as_json has no effect?

家住魔仙堡 提交于 2019-12-05 17:39:23
I'm trying to override as_json in one of my models, partly to include data from another model, partly to strip out some unnecessary fields. From what I've read this is the preferred approach in Rails 3. To keep it simple, let's say I've got something like: class Country < ActiveRecord::Base def as_json(options={}) super( :only => [:id,:name] ) end end and in my controller simply def show respond_to do |format| format.json { render :json => @country } end end Yet whatever i try, the output always contains the full data, the fields are not filtered by the ":only" clause. Basically, my override

Why variables are not behaving as same as method while Overriding.? [duplicate]

自作多情 提交于 2019-12-05 17:15:13
This question already has an answer here: why java polymorphism not work in my example 3 answers Generally Overriding is the concept of Re-defining the meaning of the member in the sub class.Why variables are not behaving like methods while Overriding in java ? For instance: class Base { int a = 10; void display() { System.out.println("Inside Base :"); } } class Derived extends Base { int a = 99; @Override // method overriding void display() { System.out.println("Inside Derived :"); } } public class NewClass { public static void main(String... a) { Derived d = new Derived(); Base b = d; b