merge

How to force consistent line endings in Git commits with cross-platform compatibility

时光怂恿深爱的人放手 提交于 2020-01-21 19:39:50
问题 I am having issues with merge conflicts due to line endings while working with someone who uses a different OS. I work on Windows and my colleague is on Mac. When he pushes his changes, sometimes files he hasn't worked on show up in the diff as being changed, because the line endings now show ^M on each file. This has lead to merge conflicts. I read in the Git docs the following: Git can handle this by auto-converting CRLF line endings into LF when you add a file to the index, and vice versa

How to merge two seperate - yet similar - codebases into one SVN rep?

前提是你 提交于 2020-01-21 12:06:10
问题 I have /var/www/cool_codebase on www.example.com AND I have /var/www/cool_codebase on www.example.net The codebases are for the same web app running on different servers. There is some specialisation between the codebases (client-specific bits and bobs etc) - but not too much. One codebase has files that the other doesn't and vice-versa. Some bits of programming are different too. I have downloaded each codebase to my localhost and my question is: How can I merge these two folders into one

How to merge two seperate - yet similar - codebases into one SVN rep?

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2020-01-21 12:05:07
问题 I have /var/www/cool_codebase on www.example.com AND I have /var/www/cool_codebase on www.example.net The codebases are for the same web app running on different servers. There is some specialisation between the codebases (client-specific bits and bobs etc) - but not too much. One codebase has files that the other doesn't and vice-versa. Some bits of programming are different too. I have downloaded each codebase to my localhost and my question is: How can I merge these two folders into one

Merge r brings error “'by' must specify uniquely valid columns”

泄露秘密 提交于 2020-01-21 04:06:29
问题 R doesn't like me today... I have two tables asembled via cbind(). Tab 1 ( dwd_nogap ) is x1 col1_x1 col2_x1 A "1982 12 01 00:00" " 0.4" " 0" B "1982 12 02 00:00" " -0.5" " 0" C "1982 12 03 00:00" " -0.2" " 0" D "1982 12 04 00:00" " -1" " 0.1" E "1982 12 05 00:00" " -0.9" " 0" F "1982 12 06 00:00" " 3.7" " 4.1" Tab 2 ( dwd_gap ) is: x2 col1_x2 col2_x2 [1,] "1982 12 01 00:00" " 0.4" " 0" [2,] "1982 12 03 00:00" " -0.2" " 0" [3,] "1982 12 04 00:00" " -1" " 0.1" [4,] "1982 12 05 00:00" " -0.9" "

Merge r brings error “'by' must specify uniquely valid columns”

我们两清 提交于 2020-01-21 04:05:17
问题 R doesn't like me today... I have two tables asembled via cbind(). Tab 1 ( dwd_nogap ) is x1 col1_x1 col2_x1 A "1982 12 01 00:00" " 0.4" " 0" B "1982 12 02 00:00" " -0.5" " 0" C "1982 12 03 00:00" " -0.2" " 0" D "1982 12 04 00:00" " -1" " 0.1" E "1982 12 05 00:00" " -0.9" " 0" F "1982 12 06 00:00" " 3.7" " 4.1" Tab 2 ( dwd_gap ) is: x2 col1_x2 col2_x2 [1,] "1982 12 01 00:00" " 0.4" " 0" [2,] "1982 12 03 00:00" " -0.2" " 0" [3,] "1982 12 04 00:00" " -1" " 0.1" [4,] "1982 12 05 00:00" " -0.9" "

How to automatically resolve merge conflicts by selecting the remote version in Git?

丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2020-01-21 02:44:11
问题 Is there any way to specify to git to automatically resolve the conflicts for a pack of files by taking the remote version for each of them? For instance, to take the remote version of each files in a certain directory? 回答1: git-merge seems to support only the "ours" strategy, where the result of a merge is the local version. And that only for the whole tree. If you enter a conflicted state while doing a merge, you can use git-checkout's --theirs with a path to retrieve files from the index.

Git merge strategy to ignore deleted files

别来无恙 提交于 2020-01-21 01:00:25
问题 I have special branch (release branch) which is an exact copy of master branch with some files and directories removed. No development is happening on this branch, however it must be in sync with master, so updates on master must be constantly pushed to that branch. By doing a normal merge ( git merge master ) I constantly get conflicts like (a sample README file for example): CONFLICT (delete/modify): README deleted in HEAD and modified in master which is expected: I try to merge changes in

清北学堂—2020.1提高储备营—Day 2 morning

我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2020-01-20 21:53:13
qbxt Day 2 morning ——2020.1.18 济南 主讲:李佳实 目录一览 1.并查集 2.堆 总知识点:基础数据结构 一、并查集 1.描述:并查集是一类十分常用的数据类型,它有着十分广泛的应用。在信息竞赛中,它主要执行的操作一般有三种。 (1) 合并a,b两个元素所在的集合 Merge(a,b) (2)查找某个元素属于哪个集合 find(k) (3)查询两个元素是否属于同一集合 Query(a,b) 2.函数模板 (1)find int find(int x){ if(fa[x]==x) return x; //找到即返回 int t=find(fa[x]); //继续递归find return t; } (2)Merge void merge(int x,int y){ x=find(x); y=find(y); if(x==y) return; //根相同,无需合并,即返回 fa[x]=y; //根不同,即合并 } 3.对于find和merge的优化 (1) 对于merge:启发式合并(使用次数少) 描述:在合并集合S1、S2的时候,我们让较小的树成为较大的树的子树。这里可以是深度、节点个数等启发函数来比较树的大小(一般使用深度)。 代码实现会使用到并查集,而且并不常用,暂且略。 (2) 对于find:路径压缩(常用,效率高,代码简单) 描述

LSM树由来、设计思想以及应用到HBase的索引

不打扰是莪最后的温柔 提交于 2020-01-20 17:35:49
讲LSM树之前,需要提下三种基本的存储引擎,这样才能清楚 LSM树的由来 : 哈希存储引擎 是哈希表的持久化实现,支持增、删、改以及随机读取操作, 但不支持顺序扫描 ,对应的存储系统为key-value存储系统。对于key-value的插入以及查询,哈希表的复杂度都是O(1),明显比树的操作O(n)快,如果不需要有序的遍历数据,哈希表就是your Mr.Right B树存储引擎是B树 (关于B树的由来,数据结构以及应用场景可以看之前一篇博文) 的持久化实现,不仅支持单条记录的增、删、读、改操作,还支持顺序扫描(B+树的叶子节点之间的指针),对应的存储系统就是关系数据库(Mysql等)。 LSM树(Log-Structured Merge Tree)存储引擎和B树存储引擎一样,同样支持增、删、读、改、顺序扫描操作。而且通过批量存储技术规避磁盘随机写入问题。 当然凡事有利有弊,LSM树和B+树相比,LSM树牺牲了部分读性能,用来大幅提高写性能。 通过以上的分析,应该知道LSM树的由来了,LSM树的设计思想非常朴素: 将对数据的修改增量保持在内存中,达到指定的大小限制后将这些修改操作批量写入磁盘 ,不过读取的时候稍微麻烦,需要合并磁盘中历史数据和内存中最近修改操作,所以写入性能大大提升,读取时可能需要先看是否命中内存,否则需要访问较多的磁盘文件。极端的说

How to resolve git merge conflict, from command line, using a given strategy, for just one file?

泄露秘密 提交于 2020-01-20 04:33:06
问题 Let's say I did a git merge and have a conflict in some file, say package.json or pom.xml , and perhaps some other files. I would like to automatically resolve merge conflicts for certain files from command line, while letting myself resolve manually all the other conflicts, if any, and making sure I don't lose valuable changes from any branch. Because of 2), I can't use git merge -Xours as this would resolve all conflicts. I want to resolve only conflicts in one particular file. Because of 3