linked-list

What is the comparable interface called in golang?

淺唱寂寞╮ 提交于 2019-12-05 01:22:56
I'm working on a simple linked list implementation in golang for learning purposes. The definition of an element is below: type Element struct { next, prev *Element Value interface{} } As you can see, the Value can be anything that satisfies the empty interface. Now, as a new feature, I would like to make it so that when you insert a new element into the list, it inserts it in a sorted manner - each element will be <= the next. In order to do this, I wrote the following method: func (l *LinkedList) Add(val interface{}) *Element { this := &l.Root e := Element{Value: val} for { if this.next

Creating a linked list or similar queue in MySQL?

╄→гoц情女王★ 提交于 2019-12-05 00:39:36
问题 I have a table of items that need to be displayed in a certain order, but that order can be changed. Items can be added at the beginning, end, or in the middle, and items can be rearranged. How can I set up the table to keep track of that order in such a way that it's easy to modify but the list can also be fetched in order with a single query? For example, I could have a "NEXT_ID" column to do it linked list-style, but then how would I run a SELECT query to get the rows in order of the NEXT

What is the point of PHP's SplDoublyLinkedList class, and more importantly, Linked Lists in general?

折月煮酒 提交于 2019-12-04 22:42:34
On a quest to expand my programming prowess, I've delved ever-so-slightly into The Standard PHP Library . This led to my discovery of the SplDoublyLinkedList class. From there I read the descriptions of Linked Lists and Doubly Linked Lists on Wikipedia. I understand how they work... But I cannot conceive of a reason WHY we need it—or better yet a practical example of SplDoublyLinkedList since we have indexed and associative arrays in PHP. How are Linked Lists normally used in-and-out of PHP? The SPL data structures reduce memory consumption and improve performance. Good explanations: Data

How to properly define an array of linked list in Java ? [duplicate]

六月ゝ 毕业季﹏ 提交于 2019-12-04 22:41:49
问题 This question already has answers here : Java 1.6: Creating an array of List<T> (4 answers) Closed 4 years ago . I tried to define an array of linked list in Java like the following, which compiled fine but it generated 2 warning messages. LinkedList<Long> [] hashtable = new LinkedList[10]; warning: [rawtypes] found raw type: LinkedList LinkedList<Long> [] hashtable = new LinkedList[10]; ^ missing type arguments for generic class LinkedList<E> where E is a type-variable: E extends Object

Solving Josephus with linked lists

a 夏天 提交于 2019-12-04 22:08:17
I've been tryin for a while but i cant figure out how to make the program below take N as input and generate an M in order that the last soldier that dies is the 13th(N>13); int main() { int N, M; struct node { int player_id; struct node *next; }; struct node *p, *q; int i, count; printf("Enter N (number of players): "); scanf("%d", &N); printf("Enter M (every M-th payer gets eliminated): "); scanf("%d", &M); // Create circular linked list containing all the players: p = q = malloc(sizeof(struct node)); p->player_id = 1; for (i = 2; i <= N; ++i) { p->next = malloc(sizeof(struct node)); p = p-

Dynamic array merge in java [closed]

那年仲夏 提交于 2019-12-04 21:56:43
Closed. This question is off-topic . It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 4 years ago . I have two array like this. String[] arr1 = { "1", "2", "3" }; String[] arr2 = { "111", "222", "333", "444", "555", "666", "777", "888", "999" }; I want to merge these two array using combination of index value. My input will be two integer value (2:3 ratio), like this int firstArray = 2; //input value int secondArray = 4; //input value After merge all value will be stored in single list. Now i need output like

Delete the last node of a linked list

南楼画角 提交于 2019-12-04 21:44:20
I am trying to delete the last Node of a linked list, I have the first element of the list. But the function does not work I would be happy if you could help me Code - void deleteNode(Node* firstNode) { Node* currNode = firstNode; while (currNode->next != NULL) { currNode = currNode->next; } delete currNode->next; currNode->next = NULL; } You are deleting the one after the last node, which should be NULL anyways. void deleteNode(Node* firstNode) { //first check if firstNode is NULL or last node. if(firstNode == NULL) return; if(firstNode->next == NULL) { delete firstNode; firstNode = NULL;

Destructor for a linked List

感情迁移 提交于 2019-12-04 20:41:35
I have a linked_list and currently my destructor is not working properly. Not entirely sure why. Can somebody explain me how to solve this? class linked_list { private: struct node { // String in this node std::string data; // Pointer to next node struct node *next; }; //First item in the list struct node *first; Here is my destructor linked_list::~linked_list(void) { while (first) { delete first; first = first->next; } } The problem lies here: delete first; first = first->next; When you delete first , but then try to access first->next . Cache first->next into a temp variable of type node* ,

Algorithm for deleting one element in an single linked list with O(1) complexity

余生颓废 提交于 2019-12-04 20:23:06
问题 I'm a student of computer science in Germany. My professor gave use the following question to think about: 'Given a reference to a node in a single linked list (which is not the last node). Give an algorithm to delete this element from the list which has O(1) complexity while maintaining the integrity'. I thought about this, but I'm pretty sure, that there is no such algorithm. since it is a single linked list, you must loop through every node in the list until you reach the node which should

Hashtable and list side by side?

天涯浪子 提交于 2019-12-04 20:03:54
I need a data structure that is ordered but also gives fast random access and inserts and removes. Linkedlists are ordered and fast in inserts and removes but they give slow random access. Hashtables give fast random access but are not ordered. So, it seems to nice to use both of them together. In my current solution, my Hashtable includes iterators of the list and the List contains the actual items. Nice and effective. Okay, it requires double the memory but that's not an issue. I have heard that some tree structures could do this also, but are they as fast as this solution? The most