licensing

Closed . This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post . No offence intended, but let's not discuss that licensing schemes can be cracked (I know that) and that recourse to the law is usually a better deterrent (maybe in your country, but no in all). Not my choice - I have been told to implement licensing, just good enough to keep casual hackers away. What might make this slightly different is that the PCs which will run the software won't

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. I am about to host my first open source project. I will be hosting it on codeplex where I can choose between the follwing licenses: Apache License 2.0, Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL), Eclipse Public License (EPL), GNU General Public License (GPL) v2, GNU Library General Public License (LGPL), Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL), Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL), Mozilla Public License 1.1 (MPL), New

I've build a ASP.NET MVC 3 (RC at the moment) site that uses OpenID login system. I was still learning about OpenID while implementing this so I commented the code heavily. The result is a site that let's users login/register with OpenID, add other OpenIDs to their account and also remove them. This little project can be then used as a starting point for any new project that would use OpenID login system. It can also be used as a resource for people to learn OpenID with. I decided to release this project as open source. This will be my first open source project and I need to decided what