git-merge

问题 When trying to keep my feature branch up to date with the master branch, I have to merge the master branch to my feature branch from time to time. Is it correct that if such a merge succeeds, it will create a new commit on the feature branch? If such a merge fails, I will have to manually resolve the merge conflict. In such a case, is it a good idea to make a commit which includes both the changes which I make for resolving merge conflict and some work I do on the feature branch? Or shall I

问题 I have following problem: I have some common commit A for two branches Branch1 and Branch2. Branch1 is a public branch (lies on server) Branch2 is a local branch In Branch1 I changed file ( BAD_folder/somefile.txt ). Changes were pushed to server. In Branch2 I renamed BAD_folder to folder and made some changes in somefile.txt . I want to merge Branch1 with Branch2, but I get a merge conflict in BAD_folder/somefile.txt file. How can I resolve this? 回答1: You can rename folder to BAD_folder ,

问题 I need help in understanding git rebase for this situation. I checked out a branch created by some one 10 days back. I checked out using git checkout -b <some name> origin/branchname (I just used different name to identify it) After checkout, if I do rebase by being in this checked out branch, git rebase origin/master It shows some errors like 1) Trailing whitespace - I read about this but even after trying this command that I found online, i still see the warnings. git config core.whitespace

问题 My team uses git and Bitbucket for version control. I had previously created a Pull Request from one of the branches of my repository to one of the branches of the team's main repository. This pull request was accepted and my branch was merged in. Yesterday I added some changes to the same branch in my repository. When I tried to create a pull request to the same branch on team's repository, I was notified of some merge conflicts. I viewed the commit log of the team's branch and realized that

问题 Suppose I have a project on MASTER branch with 100s of php files. To do a bug fixing in the project, i create a separate branch git checkout -b bugfix Then after fixing the bug in 3 files (for eg index.php, register.php and login.php), i merge it in the master branch git checkout master git merge bugfix The above code will merge all the 3 files i made changes, but is there anyway that i can force GIT to merge only 2 files, say login.php and register.php only? 回答1: There are two approaches:

问题 I have to test a bug fix and I need to create a criss-cross merge between two branches. There isn't much documentation and I am fairly new to Git. I'm not submitting code, just testing the functionality of our code review system. The single file I am using to make changes is a simple Read me text file. 回答1: When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one best common ancestor for two commits. For example, with this topology: ---1---o---A \ / X / \ ---2---o---o---B The

问题 I have a Git repository with two branches: master and Release/v1.0 . On master there's a branch policy that I cannot directly push to it, I can just contribute through Pull Requests. Now, I'm fixing a bug on Release/v1.0 and want to merge it to master. Therefore I do the following: // create a new branch from master where I merge the changes from Release/v1.0 git checkout -b merge-to-master // start the merge git merge origin/Release/v1.0 // merge gets committed automatically, so I just need

问题 I am very new to git and I have been seeing this every once in a while. For example: I work on my branch branch-A for few days (branch is created from develop fresh copy) I do git add . / git commit -m "blahblah" to stage and commit my changes Now I want to get latest changes from remote and merge it into my branch so I ensure I work on latest code to do so, I do git checkout develop to switch to my local develop branch, git status shows I'm behind 37 commits myMBPro:MyProj$ git status On

问题 When I merge between branches, git does a recursive merge with conflicts, putting in <<<<<<< Temporary merge branch x blocks. It's a bit nasty, resulting in 25 conflicts requiring manual intervention in kdiff3. I then do a git merge-base, which returns just a single SHA1 (see my other question if you could help me understand why). If I manually build up a 3-way merge in kdiff3 using the code from that commit as the base, it's much simpler, with only 2 straightforward conflicts to manually

问题 I'm using git-svn for offline development against my company's Subversion repository, which is the project's repository of record. To enable management visibility I'm required to maintain my feature branches in SVN. Sometimes I need to merge changes from our trunk to a feature branch multiple times over the lifetime of the branch. Since I'm required to keep the branch up-to-date in SVN I have to merge; I can't rebase commits once they're pushed to SVN. Further, git svn dcommit removes the