git-merge

问题 I created a feature branch from master branch. After that there is a commit [F1] from feature branch. [F1] -- Feature Branch / [M1]-[M2] -- Master Branch After that, feature branch is merged in master branch, and there are two more commits [M3] and [M4] in master branch. [F1] -- Feature Branch / \ [M1]-[M2]-[F1]-[M3]-[M4] -- Master Branch Now I added two more commits to feature branch. [F1]-[F2]-[F3] -- Feature Branch / \ [M1]-[M2]-[F1]-[M3]-[M4] -- Master Branch At this time, should I first

问题 I have not done so much with git so far. Now, I have the following problem. While I did some local modifications and commits, my colleague restructured files and folders within a new branch. Then, I added a remote tracking branch (reflecting his changes) and tried to merge my modifications into it. Of course it fails as the files moved to another location. How can I go onwards? A 'git status' shows me this: # On branch develop # You have unmerged paths. # (fix conflicts and run "git commit")

问题 Suppose we have branch A, and branch B. Branch A works on file a.cpp, and have several commits say commit ID 10000 10001, 10002, 10003 (faked). Branch B has a.cpp. a.cpp still shows the old commit ID 10000. [Note] Branch B has other commits already. But a.cpp history in Gighub only show one old commit ID 10000. Now we merge A to B. In B, we have a.cpp. What are its history commit ID series "FOR a.cpp File"? I didn't mean the commit history for B. I mean the history for the file a.cpp (you

问题 Goal : keep a clean history of master, whilst also keeping the intermediary commits. For instance , let's start with a master branch: M1 --- M2 --- M3 ^ master I work on a feature/bug/whatever on a new branch: M1 --- M2 --- M3 ^ \ | \- F1 --- F2 -- F3 | ^ master feature And when I merge into master, I want M3 to be the parent, but also keep the "iterations" you took to reach from M3 to the new commit. This can be done with merge --no-ff : M1 --- M2 --- M3 ----------------------- M4 \ / ^ \-

问题 I merged the wrong remote repo master branch into my local master branch, once I started resolving conflicts I realized my horrible mistake. However, I didn't completely resolve the conflicts and therefore didn't commit the merge. Also, I committed my last changes to my local master copy before starting the merge. How do I successfully revert to the last local commit before the bad merge? 回答1: If you still are in the merge state, you can try git merge --abort to check what state you are in

问题 How to force git merge to generate conflict on all file or all file that differ to generate conflict having whole old and whole new version, example of such file : <<<<<<<<<<A A B C D OLD OLD OLD E F G ... Z ============ A B C D NEW NEW NEW EEEEEEE FFFFF GGG ... Z >>>>>>>>>>B The idea is that I would like to merge manually having whole contents of two files, no metter if lines are identical or one branch is inheriting from whole previous, example: $ echo ABC > file $ git add file $ git commit

问题 I followed one of the answers in How to replace master branch in git, entirely, from another branch? with the following commands: git checkout seotweaks git merge -s ours master git checkout master git merge seotweaks Then I pushed the changes to the remote repository. Unfortunately these changes erased EVERYTHING on the old MASTER which was entirely replaced by the seotweaks branch including the history itself. Is there a way to undo this and go back to the old MASTER? 回答1: Nothing is erased

问题 As per my recent question on merging branches using GitPython, I'm trying to unit test the solution there. To do so I need to simulate a user opening their merge tool, resolving the conflicts and committing the result. If I do this manually using the CLI it all seems to work: echo 'Something to resolve the conflict' > conflicted_file.txt git add conflicted_file.txt git commit -m "Conflict resolved" I've tried to simulate that same process using GitPython: filename = 'conflicted_file.txt" with

问题 So I've run into an issue with git where when I rebase or cherry pick a specific commit, I will get much more information than is in that specific commit. That issue is outlined really nicely in this question here: Am I misunderstanding git cherry-pick? And that is all well and good, I understand that it is picking up history because the commit I want depends on that history being there. What I don't get is how to get around it. I really don't want cherry pick to apply all of that history,

问题 I have readonly access to repo A and have my own repo B . Repo A contained multiple branches A1 , A2 etc repo B has branches B1 , B2 etc. Both repo A and repo B has remotes Repo A branch A1 equal to repo B branch B1 folder F so how can I merge all changes from repo A branch A1 to repo B branch B1 folder F using git command by keeping all the history? Currently I am just copying the files manually by overriding the content on B1 folder F which is not right I believe. UPDATE what I've done so