compilation

I have a class A with a static inner class inside it called B : import static A.B.*; class A { static class B { static int x; static int y; } public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println(x); } } I want to static import everything in B , but it wont work: $ javac A.java A.java:1: package A does not exist import static A.B.*; ^ A.java:9: cannot find symbol symbol : variable x location: class A System.out.println(x); ^ 2 errors Why? Reimeus This won't work if A is in the default package. However, you could add a package declaration: package mypackage; and use import static

I have already tried: g++ -std=c++11 my_file.cpp -o my_prog g++ -std=c++0x ... g++ -std=gnu++0x ... and I keep getting this message: error: unrecognized command line option C++0x/C++11 Support in GCC From there you can see that C++11 is supported since gcc 4.7 and gcc 4.4 has C++0x support. Quote from Status of Experimental C++0x Support in GCC 4.4 : GCC provides experimental support for the upcoming ISO C++ standard, C++0x. This support can be enabled with the -std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x compiler options; the former disables GNU extensions. So it should work with -std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x .

This problem is driving me insane. Whatever I do, I get the problem "No such module 'Armchair'" when I archive. It works when I build but when I archive XCode messes with me. I see XCode archiving/compiling Armchair. I have added $(PROJECT_DIR)/AppName/External/Armchair/build/Release-iphoneos to Framework Search Paths . I have added the framework in Embedded binaries I have added the framework in Linked Frameworks and Libraries I have also tried with adding the framework to copy frameworks in my Build Phases I have tried by adding the Armchair framework to my workspace instead and only added &

I’m trying to compile openssl-1.1.0e on Centos 7 (7.3.1611) but after i successfully compiled everything without any warning, i get an error when i’m trying any openssl command [mdm@dev openssl-1.1.0e]$ openssl version openssl: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.1.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Is it a bug or my mistake? Here below some info about my system/configuration Configure: [mdm@dev openssl-1.1.0e]$ ./Configure linux-x86_64 --prefix=/usr/local --openssldir=/usr/local Make/Make test: ... All tests successful. Files=91, Tests=486, 44 wallclock

I am trying to load a html template with ng-repeats in it and then use the $compile service to compile it and use the compiled html in an email. The problem.... Ok before asking let me set terminology... binding placeholder: {{customer.name}} binding value: 'john doe' Using $interpolate i get the actual binding values but does not work with ng-repeats. Example: var html = $interpolate('<p>{{customer.name}}</p>')($scope) Returns: '<p>john doe</p>' Ng-repeats do not work Using $compile i get the bindings placeholders ie {{customer.name}} but what I need is the binding value 'john doe' . Example:

I want to create a .exe of ndpiReader.c demo program that comes with nDPI library . I was successful to compile it on Ubuntu using commands specified on their github page as bellow: ./autogen.sh ./configure make I have tried to cross compile it using GCC inside Ubuntu but I wasn't successful. I also tried to use the pcapExample.sln to compile it in Visual Studio 2012, but I keep getting error messages like: Error 29 error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'ndpi_api.h': No such file or directory Although ndpi_api.h and all other files that I get this error for already are listed in the project

I'm writing a Tiger compiler in C# and I'm going to translate the Tiger code into IL . While implementing the semantic check of every node in my AST, I created lots of unit tests for this. That is pretty simple, because my CheckSemantic method looks like this: public override void CheckSemantics(Scope scope, IList<Error> errors) { ... } so, if I want to write some unit test for the semantic check of some node, all I have to do is build an AST, and call that method. Then I can do something like: Assert.That(errors.Count == 0); or Assert.That(errors.Count == 1); Assert.That(errors[0] is

I work in a small iPhone development team, in our office, we have at least 4 copies of XCode running on the network at any one time. Contemplating getting everyone to have it running. We're networked together using a standard WIFI Switch, so network speed and latency isn't as good as wired network... Just wondering, is there any real time gain to be had on using distributed builds? Once it passes the relevant data back and forth over the network. At least for relatively small projects. it depends on your project, its dependencies, and the amount of data that must be transferred. 15-20 seconds