closures

Closure counter inside setInterval

血红的双手。 提交于 2020-05-13 07:10:29
问题 I have a function: setInterval(function () { var counter = 0; (function() { counter = counter + 1; console.log(counter); })(counter) }, 1000) Why does not it increment the counter? (instead, it logs 1's). How to make it log ascending numbers? (1, 2, 3, ....) 回答1: You are passing an argument to your anonymous function, but you aren't assigning that argument to a variable. You forgot to put the arguments in the function definition. You are creating new variables with every iteration instead of

Closure counter inside setInterval

主宰稳场 提交于 2020-05-13 07:09:55
问题 I have a function: setInterval(function () { var counter = 0; (function() { counter = counter + 1; console.log(counter); })(counter) }, 1000) Why does not it increment the counter? (instead, it logs 1's). How to make it log ascending numbers? (1, 2, 3, ....) 回答1: You are passing an argument to your anonymous function, but you aren't assigning that argument to a variable. You forgot to put the arguments in the function definition. You are creating new variables with every iteration instead of

Understanding Spark's closures and their serialization

天涯浪子 提交于 2020-05-10 07:15:25
问题 Disclaimer: just starting to play with Spark. I'm having troubles understanding the famous "Task not serializable" exception but my question is a little different from those I see on SO (or so I think). I have a tiny custom RDD ( TestRDD ). It has a field which stores objects whose class does not implement Serializable ( NonSerializable ). I've set the "spark.serializer" config option to use Kryo. However, when I try count() on my RDD, I get the following: Caused by: java.io

Is there a way to have a Rust closure that moves only some variables into it?

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2020-05-06 17:46:53
问题 I have a general struct with settings and an extra variable setting that I want to tune and play around with. For all possible values in an integer range, I want to start a (scoped) thread with this variable set to that value. Depending on this value, they do slightly different work. Each of these threads should be able to read the general settings struct. use crossbeam; // 0.7.3 struct Settings { // ... many fields } const MAX_FEASIBLE_SCORE: u8 = 10; fn example(settings: Settings) {

Is there a way to have a Rust closure that moves only some variables into it?

依然范特西╮ 提交于 2020-05-06 17:45:17
问题 I have a general struct with settings and an extra variable setting that I want to tune and play around with. For all possible values in an integer range, I want to start a (scoped) thread with this variable set to that value. Depending on this value, they do slightly different work. Each of these threads should be able to read the general settings struct. use crossbeam; // 0.7.3 struct Settings { // ... many fields } const MAX_FEASIBLE_SCORE: u8 = 10; fn example(settings: Settings) {

closure through typealias swift not working

匆匆过客 提交于 2020-04-17 17:59:27
问题 why does typealias closure not transmit data and output nothing to the console? How to fix it? class viewModel: NSObject { var abc = ["123", "456", "789"] typealias type = ([String]) -> Void var send: type? func createCharts(_ dataPoints: [String]) { var dataEntry: [String] = [] for item in dataPoints { dataEntry.append(item) } send?(dataEntry) } override init() { super.init() self.createCharts(abc) } } class ViewController: UIViewController { var viewModel: viewModel = viewModel() func type(

closure through typealias swift not working

∥☆過路亽.° 提交于 2020-04-17 17:59:24
问题 why does typealias closure not transmit data and output nothing to the console? How to fix it? class viewModel: NSObject { var abc = ["123", "456", "789"] typealias type = ([String]) -> Void var send: type? func createCharts(_ dataPoints: [String]) { var dataEntry: [String] = [] for item in dataPoints { dataEntry.append(item) } send?(dataEntry) } override init() { super.init() self.createCharts(abc) } } class ViewController: UIViewController { var viewModel: viewModel = viewModel() func type(

Swift 5 : What's 'Escaping closure captures mutating 'self' parameter' and how to fix it

大憨熊 提交于 2020-04-07 03:40:09
问题 Hello guys I'm trying to make a simple and re-usable Swift Network Layer Maybe it's not the best way to loop returned data in view but after I tried to get the returned Api data to Loop it in SwiftUI view I'm getting error : Escaping closure captures mutating 'self' parameter And don't know where or what i missed in this lesson and here's a picture of the file ContentView.swift struct ContentView: View { var emptyDataArr: [CollectionItem] = [] init() { ServiceLayer.request(router: Router

Borrowed value does not live long enough, moved due to use in closure E0597

可紊 提交于 2020-03-17 03:17:04
问题 I am taking my first steps on Actix-Web. But this closure causes me errors #[derive(Deserialize, Serialize, Debug, Copy, Clone)] pub struct PaginationQuery { pub limit: Option<u32>, pub offset: Option<u32>, } pub fn get_all_trainings_2( query: web::Query<PaginationQuery>, pool: web::Data<Pool>, ) -> impl Future<Item = HttpResponse, Error = Error> { let mut pagination = query.0; // Thread Blocking web::block(move || database::get_exercises(pool, pagination)).then(|res| { match res { Ok(

Borrowed value does not live long enough, moved due to use in closure E0597

限于喜欢 提交于 2020-03-17 03:16:42
问题 I am taking my first steps on Actix-Web. But this closure causes me errors #[derive(Deserialize, Serialize, Debug, Copy, Clone)] pub struct PaginationQuery { pub limit: Option<u32>, pub offset: Option<u32>, } pub fn get_all_trainings_2( query: web::Query<PaginationQuery>, pool: web::Data<Pool>, ) -> impl Future<Item = HttpResponse, Error = Error> { let mut pagination = query.0; // Thread Blocking web::block(move || database::get_exercises(pool, pagination)).then(|res| { match res { Ok(