cherry-pick

git cherry-pick says “…38c74d is a merge but no -m option was given”

徘徊边缘 提交于 2019-11-26 12:36:07
I made some changes in my master branch and want to bring those upstream. when I cherry-pick the following commits however I get stuck on fd9f578 where git says: $ git cherry-pick fd9f578 fatal: Commit fd9f57850f6b94b7906e5bbe51a0d75bf638c74d is a merge but no -m option was given. What is git trying to tell me and is cherry-pick the right thing to be using here? The master branch does include changes to files which have been modified in the upstream branch, so I'm sure there will be some merge conflicts but those aren't too bad to straighten out. I know which changes are needed where. These

What Git branching models work for you?

丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2019-11-26 12:33:32
问题 Our company is currently using a simple trunk/release/hotfixes branching model and would like advice on what branching models work best for your company or development process. Workflows / branching models Below are the three main descriptions of this I have seen, but they are partially contradicting each other or don\'t go far enough to sort out the subsequent issues we\'ve run into (as described below). Thus our team so far defaults to not so great solutions. Are you doing something better?

git cherry-pick not working

点点圈 提交于 2019-11-26 08:19:57
问题 I\'m trying to cherry-pick a commit from master and get it into the current production branch. However, when I execute git cherry-pick <SHA-hash> , I just get this message: # On branch prod_20110801 # Untracked files: # (use \"git add <file>...\" to include in what will be committed) # site/test-result/ nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use \"git add\" to track) The previous cherry-pick is now empty, possibly due to conflict resolution. If you wish to commit it anyway, use:

Is it possible to cherry-pick a commit from another git repository?

梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-11-26 06:51:09
问题 I\'m working with a git repository that needs a commit from another git repository that knows nothing of the first. Typically I would cherry-pick using the HEAD@{x} in the reflog, but because this .git knows nothing of this reflog entry (different physical directory), how can I cherry-pick this, or can I? I\'m using git-svn . My first branch is using git-svn of the trunk of a Subversion repo, and the next branch is using git-svn on a Subversion branch. 回答1: You'll need to add the other

How to git-cherry-pick only changes to certain files?

被刻印的时光 ゝ 提交于 2019-11-26 04:28:58
问题 If I want to merge into a Git branch the changes made only to some of the files changed in a particular commit which includes changes to multiple files, how can this be achieved? Suppose the Git commit called stuff has changes to files A , B , C , and D but I want to merge only stuff \'s changes to files A and B . It sounds like a job for git cherry-pick but cherry-pick only knows how to merge entire commits, not a subset of the files. 回答1: I'd do it with cherry-pick -n ( --no-commit ) which

Git Cherry-pick vs Merge Workflow

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-11-26 03:46:09
问题 Assuming I am the maintainer of a repo, and I want to pull in changes from a contributor, there are a few possible workflows: I cherry-pick each commit from the remote (in order). In this case git records the commit as unrelated to the remote branch. I merge the branch, pulling in all changes, and adding a new \"conflict\" commit (if needed). I merge each commit from the remote branch individually (again in order), allowing conflicts to be recorded for each commit, instead of grouped all

git cherry-pick says “…38c74d is a merge but no -m option was given”

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-11-26 03:01:49
问题 I made some changes in my master branch and want to bring those upstream. when I cherry-pick the following commits however I get stuck on fd9f578 where git says: $ git cherry-pick fd9f578 fatal: Commit fd9f57850f6b94b7906e5bbe51a0d75bf638c74d is a merge but no -m option was given. What is git trying to tell me and is cherry-pick the right thing to be using here? The master branch does include changes to files which have been modified in the upstream branch, so I\'m sure there will be some

Remove specific commit

陌路散爱 提交于 2019-11-26 03:01:37
问题 I was working with a friend on a project, and he edited a bunch of files that shouldn\'t have been edited. Somehow I merged his work into mine, either when I pulled it, or when I tried to just pick the specific files out that I wanted. I\'ve been looking and playing for a long time, trying to figure out how to remove the commits that contain the edits to those files, it seems to be a toss up between revert and rebase, and there are no straightforward examples, and the docs assume I know more

How to cherry-pick multiple commits

為{幸葍}努か 提交于 2019-11-26 01:34:45
问题 I have two branches. Commit a is the head of one, while the other has b , c , d , e and f on top of a . I want to move c , d , e and f to first branch without commit b . Using cherry pick it is easy: checkout first branch cherry-pick one by one c to f and rebase second branch onto first. But is there any way to cherry-pick all c - f in one command? Here is a visual description of the scenario (thanks JJD): 回答1: Git 1.7.2 introduced the ability to cherrypick a range of commits. From the

What does cherry-picking a commit with Git mean?

十年热恋 提交于 2019-11-26 01:27:05
问题 Recently, I have been asked to cherry-pick a commit. So what does cherry-picking a commit in git mean? How do you do it? 回答1: Cherry picking in Git means to choose a commit from one branch and apply it onto another. This is in contrast with other ways such as merge and rebase which normally apply many commits onto another branch. Make sure you are on the branch you want to apply the commit to. git checkout master Execute the following: git cherry-pick <commit-hash> N.B.: If you cherry-pick