cherry-pick

Backport changes from renamed file

狂风中的少年 提交于 2019-11-28 22:30:40
问题 I have two branches: trunk, production. I have found a problem in trunk, made fix and committed it, pushed it. Now it was tested and I need do merge changes into the production branch as a hot-fix. I try to use the cherry-pick. However it doesn't work because a changed file(s) in the fix was renamed in the trunk earlier during some refactoring which I don't want bring into production. I don't want merge everything, but take only this commit. The cherry pick fails with "deleted by us" conflict

Undoing specific revisions in Subversion

旧巷老猫 提交于 2019-11-28 17:03:59
问题 Suppose I have a set of commits in a repository folder... 123 (250 new files, 137 changed files, 14 deleted files) 122 (150 changed files) 121 (renamed folder) 120 (90 changed files) 119 (115 changed files, 14 deleted files, 12 added files) 118 (113 changed files) 117 (10 changed files) I want to get a working copy that includes all changes from revision 117 onward but does NOT include the changes for revisions 118 and 120. EDIT: To perhaps make the problem clearer, I want to undo the changes

In a Git cherry-pick or rebase merge conflict, how are BASE (aka “the ancestor”), LOCAL, and REMOTE determined?

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-11-28 16:04:47
问题 In a normal Git merge conflict, the three versions of a file in play for the three-way merge are roughly as follows: LOCAL: the version from my branch REMOTE: the version from the other branch BASE: the version from the common ancestor of the two branches (in particular, the common ancestor of my branch's HEAD and the other branch's HEAD) When a Git cherry-pick generates a merge conflict, there is no common ancestor, properly speaking, so how are these things determined? The same could be

What it means “changes introduced by a commit” in git

£可爱£侵袭症+ 提交于 2019-11-28 09:27:00
问题 Everywhere I see this: "...cherry-pick applies changes introduced by a commit..." I did this: created this file in master: ** File 1 ** Content ** Footer ** then branched out to branch2 and committed a change: ** File 1 ** Content Edit 1 ** Footer ** and then another one: ** File 1 ** Content Edit 2 Edit 1 ** Footer ** Now I went back to master and tried to cherry-pick the latest commit from branch2. I expected that only 'Edit2' will get imported since isn't this a change introduced by that

git cherry-pick to another branch

烈酒焚心 提交于 2019-11-28 02:31:54
问题 I wonder if there is the way to copy one commit to another branch without checking out that branch. For example, I have two branches: master and parallel_version . I'm on parallel_version branch and I found a bug in file common for these branches. I've fixed it and committed. How to duplicate this commit to another branch, assuming I'm using git-svn? Normally I would do: $ git checkout master $ git cherry-pick parallel_version $ git checkout parallel_version Is there better way of doing that?

Why does this cherry-pick have a conflict?

不羁的心 提交于 2019-11-27 21:20:45
I know git cherry-pick is a command that use to apply the changes of specified commit, but I think I just don't really understand the way it works. Let's say a repo act like that: git init echo a>a git add .; git commit -am 'master add line a' git checkout -b dev echo b>>a git commit -am 'dev add line b' echo c>>a git commit -am 'dev add line c' git checkout master git cherry-pick dev I thought cherry-pick command would work well and change file a into: a c but in fact I got the following message: error: could not apply 08e8d3e... dev add line c hint: after resolving the conflicts, mark the

What Git branching models work for you?

橙三吉。 提交于 2019-11-27 02:19:43
Our company is currently using a simple trunk/release/hotfixes branching model and would like advice on what branching models work best for your company or development process. Workflows / branching models Below are the three main descriptions of this I have seen, but they are partially contradicting each other or don't go far enough to sort out the subsequent issues we've run into (as described below). Thus our team so far defaults to not so great solutions. Are you doing something better? gitworkflows(7) Manual Page (nvie) A successful Git branching model (reinh) A Git Workflow for Agile

git cherry-pick not working

不羁岁月 提交于 2019-11-26 22:26:09
I'm trying to cherry-pick a commit from master and get it into the current production branch. However, when I execute git cherry-pick <SHA-hash> , I just get this message: # On branch prod_20110801 # Untracked files: # (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed) # site/test-result/ nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track) The previous cherry-pick is now empty, possibly due to conflict resolution. If you wish to commit it anyway, use: git commit --allow-empty Otherwise, please use 'git reset' Note: I've tried doing a reset and a reset -

Why does this cherry-pick have a conflict?

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-11-26 20:37:28
问题 I know git cherry-pick is a command that use to apply the changes of specified commit, but I think I just don't really understand the way it works. Let's say a repo act like that: git init echo a>a git add .; git commit -am 'master add line a' git checkout -b dev echo b>>a git commit -am 'dev add line b' echo c>>a git commit -am 'dev add line c' git checkout master git cherry-pick dev I thought cherry-pick command would work well and change file a into: a c but in fact I got the following

Remove specific commit

喜欢而已 提交于 2019-11-26 12:36:19
I was working with a friend on a project, and he edited a bunch of files that shouldn't have been edited. Somehow I merged his work into mine, either when I pulled it, or when I tried to just pick the specific files out that I wanted. I've been looking and playing for a long time, trying to figure out how to remove the commits that contain the edits to those files, it seems to be a toss up between revert and rebase, and there are no straightforward examples, and the docs assume I know more than I do. So here is a simplified version of the question: Given the following scenario, how do I remove