branch

Sharing files across branches in Git

筅森魡賤 提交于 2019-12-03 05:08:40
There are a bunch of files in my project that are sometimes modified but always shared among many different branches. Examples include build scripts, batch files that include paths, etc. Even the .gitignore file itself is an example. I want this stuff in source control, but I don't want individual branches to keep track of changes to them. How do you handle this situation? Do you track everything related to your project in Git? What's your approach to shared objects? Is .gitignore my only option? Keep your build scripts and batch files in a separate repo? Instead of relying on submodules, have

Configure Jenkins to work with SVN branches

邮差的信 提交于 2019-12-03 05:04:27
问题 I am currently setting up Jenkins to work with SVN repository. Currently it works fine for the trunk. Now I want to set up Jenkins to take care of newly created branches. I don't want to create a new project manually for every new branch in SVN. Is there already a solution which allowes to use SVN and to create jobs/tasks in Jenkins automatically for every brach created in SVN? How do you use Jenkins with SVN tags/branches? 回答1: Also check my extend answer if you are not very familiar with

Git branches & commits history after merge

旧街凉风 提交于 2019-12-03 04:58:10
问题 I'm working on a project (alone) and for every feature I develop I create a new branch, work on this feature, then merge it to master. So normally I never work on two different branches at one time and never touch master while working on a branch. When I merge a branch I see that (using gitx and gitk ) the history of master branch gets all the commits I've done to the merged branch. I mean if I have something like: master a-b-c-d \z-x-y-- |branch name after merge I get: a-b-c-d-z-x-y |branch

Subversion: howto find all revisions that are not merged to trunk?

…衆ロ難τιáo~ 提交于 2019-12-03 04:53:57
问题 Branching sources for release cycle is one of common source management scenarios. Merging as soon as possible is a good practice. Thus we have a human factor: branch is closed, but someone forgot to merge something back to trunk. Q: Is there a "one click" way to get all revision numbers that were not merged from branch X to trunk? (Note: I do not need these revision numbers to find what to merge, I need them to create automated validation, that would remind people to make sure they did not

Git: merge only the changes made on the branch

元气小坏坏 提交于 2019-12-03 04:53:02
G---H // Release Branch / / A---B---E---F--- // master \ \ C---D--- // bug fix branch Based on our particular needs for our project, it is quite common for the above scenario to occur. We have our master/dev branch with some commits. Then we get a bug report and start fixing that on the bug branch (commits C and D above). More commits happen in the dev branch in the meantime. Next we are told we need to create a release for a customer which cannot include the changes introduced by commits B, E and F above, but it should include the bug fix. So we branch off of dev before change B was ever

Mercurial: Switch working directory to branch without losing changes?

橙三吉。 提交于 2019-12-03 04:52:01
问题 Let's say that I have a named branch 'B1' which I'm doing feature development on. I am at a good stopping point before a demo though not done with the feature so I: hg up default hg merge B1 hg ci -m "merged in feature drop" hg push Now I continue working for a half an hour or so and go to commit only to realize that I forgot to update back to B1 and that my current working directory is on default - uhoh. In theory I should be able to just mark my working directory parent as the tip of B1 -

git常用命令

馋奶兔 提交于 2019-12-03 04:47:29
1、通过命令 git init 把这个目录变成git可以管理的仓库 git init 2、把文件添加到版本库中,使用命令 git add .添加到暂存区里面去,不要忘记后面的小数点“.”,意为添加文件夹下的所有文件 git add . 3、用命令 git commit告诉Git,把文件提交到仓库。引号内为提交说明 git commit -m 'first commit' 4、关联到远程库 git remote add origin 你的远程库地址 如:git remote add origin https://github.com/cade8800/ionic-demo.git 5、获取远程库与本地同步合并(如果远程库不为空必须做这一步,否则后面的提交会失败) git pull --rebase origin master 6、把本地库的内容推送到远程,使用 git push命令,实际上是把当前分支master推送到远程。执行此命令后会要求输入用户名、密码,验证通过后即开始上传。 git push -u origin master 7、状态查询命令 git status 8、切换分支 git checkout -b <#分支名master> master是分支 9、查看本地分支 git branch 10、查看本地及远程分支 git branch -a 11、删除远程分支 git

Limit on number of git branches

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-12-03 04:45:44
I am musing about building a big system on top of git for various reasons but mainly convenience. But as part of the implementation I would end up making millions of branches and branching and merging between them. Can git actually scale this way? I always hear "Branches are free" but I have to wonder if this is really true x1,000,000? Can git actually create a theoretical unlimited number of branches? Yes, branches are free. Branching and merging is very easy. The scalability issues mentioned before comes only when synchronizing a vast amount of branches through the network (git fetch, git

Folder converted to branch?

陌路散爱 提交于 2019-12-03 04:32:25
In TFS (We are using 2012) why is the default to convert your source folder to a branch? I really don't consider the source a branch. What, if any, advantages/disadvantages does this have? I'm not sure what you mean by "I don't consider the source a branch" the source folder by definition becomes a branch as soon as you create a branch from it. The target folder is also a branch which is a child of the source branch. There are no disadvantages to enabling this. Regardless of whether you have this enabled or not the Source and Target will have a branching relationship and you will be able to

Do you feel comfortable merging code?

扶醉桌前 提交于 2019-12-03 04:15:27
问题 This morning, I read two opinions on refactoring. Opinion 1 (Page not present) Opinion 2 (Page not present) They recommend branching (and subsequently merging) code to: Keep the trunk clean. Allow a developer to walk away from risky changes. In my experience (particularly with Borland's StarTeam), merging is a non-trival operation. And for that reason, I branch only when I must (i.e. when I want to freeze a release candidate). In theory, branching makes sense, but the mechanics of merging